Table 1: Montreal classification of disease activity in UC, (1).

Table 2: Distribution of UC, (2).

Table 3: Disease activity in UC Truelove and Witts, (1).

Table 4: Mayo score, (3).

Table 5: Quality and Significance of the four levels of evidence in GRADE:

Table 6: Factors that determine How to upgrade or downgrade the quality of evidence

Table 7: Vienna classification for histological classification of colorectal polyps, (7).
|
Category |
Diagnosis |
|
Group 1 |
Negative for dysplasia |
|
Group 2 |
Indefinite for dysplasia |
|
Group 3 |
Mucosal low grade neoplasia - Low grade adenoma - Low grade dysplasia |
|
Group 4 - Subgroup 4.1 - Subgroup 4.2 - Subgroup 4.3 - Subgroup 4.4 |
Mucosal high grade neoplasia - High grade adenoma/dysplasia - Carcinoma in situ - Suspicious for invasive carcinoma - Intramucosal carcinoma |
|
Group 5 |
Submucosal invasion by carcinoma |