Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic therapy

- Executive Summary

These Guidelines deal with the cornerstone recommendations of Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy.

1.     Administration of thromboprophylaxis

1.1 For each of the antithrombotic agents, we suggest that clinicians follow the FDA-approved dosing guidelines (Conditional)

2.     Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC)

2.1   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a High dose of Apixaban (Eliquis)

2.1.1        We suggest that a high dose of apixaban be discontinued at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking apixaban or aXa plasma level if <72 hours (Conditional)

2.1.2        We suggest that a residual apixaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional)

2.1.3        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

2.2   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a Low dose of Apixaban (Eliquis)

2.2.1        We suggest that a low dose of apixaban be discontinued for at least 36 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking apixaban or aXa plasma level if <36 hours (Conditional)

2.2.2        We suggest that a residual apixaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional)

2.2.3        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

2.3   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a high dose of edoxaban (Savaysa)

2.3.1        We suggest that a high dose of edoxaban be discontinued for at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking edoxaban or aXa activity plasma level if <72 hours (Conditional)

2.3.2        We suggest that a residual edoxaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional)

2.3.3        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first (postoperative) dose (Conditional)

2.4   Management of the patient receiving a Low dose of Edoxaban (Savaysa)

                   There is no FDA-approved medical indication for low-dose edoxaban.

2.5   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving High dose of Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)

2.5.1        We suggest that a high dose of rivaroxaban be discontinued for at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking rivaroxaban or aXa activity plasma level if <72 hours (Conditional)

2.5.2        We suggest that a residual rivaroxaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional)

2.5.3        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

2.6   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a Low dose of Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)

2.6.1        We suggest that a low dose of rivaroxaban be discontinued for at least 24 hours (30 hours if CrCl <30 mL/min) prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking rivaroxaban or aXa activity plasma level if <24 hours (Conditional)

2.6.2        We suggest that a residual rivaroxaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL ¹ is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional)

2.6.3        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

2.7   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a High dose of Dabigatran (Pradaxa)

2.7.1        We suggest that a high dose of dabigatran be discontinued for at least 72 hours in patients with a CrCl ≥50 mL/min prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking dabigatran plasma level if <72 hours (Conditional)

2.7.2        We suggest that a high dose of dabigatran be discontinued for 120 hours in patients with a CrCl 30–49 mL/min prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking dabigatran plasma level if <120 hours (Conditional)

2.7.3        We suggest against the performance of neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients with a CrCl <30 mL/min unless a dabigatran plasma level is obtained and <30 ng/mL (Conditional)

2.7.4        Prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block we suggest that a residual dabigatran plasma level <30 ng/mL is acceptable (Conditional)

2.7.5        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

2.8   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a Low dose of Dabigatran (Pradaxa)

2.8.1        We suggest that a low dose of dabigatran be discontinued for at least 48 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking dabigatran plasma level if <48 hours (Conditional)

2.8.2        We suggest that a residual dabigatran plasma level <30 ng/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional)

2.8.3        We suggest against the performance of neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients with a CrCl <30 mL/min unless a dabigatran plasma level is obtained and <30 ng/mL (Conditional)

2.8.4        We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

3.     Use of Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) antidotes to facilitate placement of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block

3.1   Suggest against the use of idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC), or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) to reverse DOAC anticoagulant activity to enable the safe performance of a neuraxial intervention in routine patients (Conditional)

4.     Intravenous and Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving Unfractionated Heparin

4.1   We recommend daily review of the patient’s medical record to determine the concurrent use of medications that affect other pathways of hemostasis. These medications include antiplatelet medications, LMWH, and oral anticoagulants (Strong)

4.2   Since heparin-induced thrombocytopenia may occur during heparin administration, we recommend that patients receiving intravenous or subcutaneous UFH for >4 days have a platelet count assessed (Strong)

4.3   Intravenous heparin

4.3.1       Discontinue Intravenous heparin infusion for a minimum of 4–6 hours and coagulation status be assessed and normal prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Strong)

4.3.2        Delay intravenous heparin administration for a minimum of 1 hour after needle placement (Strong)

4.3.3        It is not recommended to maintain neuraxial or deep plexus catheters in the setting of continuous intravenous heparin administration. In the event of unanticipated heparinization, we recommend monitoring the patient with an indwelling catheter to allow for early detection of motor deficits and consider use of minimal concentration of local anesthetics to enhance early detection of a neuraxial hematoma (Strong)

4.3.4        Although the occurrence of a bloody or difficult neuraxial needle placement may increase the risk of hematoma, there are no data to support mandatory cancellation of a case. Direct communication with the surgeon and a specific risk-benefit decision about proceeding in each case is recommended (Strong)

            Heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass

4.3.5        It is not recommended to maintain neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral catheters in the setting of full anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. If unanticipated heparinization occurs, we suggest postoperative monitoring of neurological status and consider use of minimal concentration of local anesthetics to enhance early detection of neuraxial hematoma (Conditional)

4.4    Subcutaneous heparin

4.4.1        Preoperative low-dose UFH for thromboprophylaxis (5000 U two times per day or three times per day). We suggest needle placement occur a minimum of 4–6 hours after heparin administration or coagulation status be assessed and normal (Conditional)

4.4.2        Preoperative high dose UFH

7500–10 000 U two times per day or a daily dose of ≤20 000 U

We suggest neuraxial block occur a minimum of 12 hours after subcutaneous heparin administration and confirmation of normal coagulation status (Conditional)

>10 000 U subcutaneously per dose, or >20 000 U total daily dose

We suggest neuraxial block occur a minimum of 24 hours after subcutaneous heparin administration and confirmation of normal coagulation status (Conditional)

4.4.3        Postoperative low-dose UFH

There is no contraindication to maintaining neuraxial catheters in the presence of low-dose UFH. We suggest catheter removal occurs a minimum of 4–6 hours after heparin administration. Subsequent heparin administration may occur immediately after catheter removal (Conditional)

4.4.4        Postoperative high-dose UFH

The safety of indwelling neuraxial catheters in patients receiving doses >5000 U at a time or >15 000 U of UFH daily has not been established. We suggest that the risk and benefits be assessed on an individual basis and that techniques to facilitate detection of new/progressive neurological deficits (eg, enhanced neurological monitoring occur and neuraxial solutions to minimize sensory and motor block) be applied (Conditional)

5.     Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)

5.1   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving low molecular weight heparin

5.1.1        The aXa level is Not predictive of the risk of bleeding, although it may be useful in monitoring efficacy of therapy with high-dose regimens. We recommend against the routine use of aXa level monitoring (Strong)

5.1.2        Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia may occur during LMWH administration; therefore, we recommend that patients receiving LMWH for >4 days have a platelet count assessed prior to needle placement (Strong)

5.1.3        The presence of blood during needle and catheter placement does not necessitate postponement of surgery. We suggest that initiation of LMWH therapy in this setting should be delayed for 24 hours postoperatively and that this consideration be discussed with the surgeon (Strong)

5.2   Preoperative LMWH

5.2.1        In patients receiving low-dose LMWH, we recommend delay of at least 12 hours prior to needle/catheter placement (Stong)

5.2.2        In patients receiving high (therapeutic) doses of LMWH, we recommend delay of at least 24 hours prior to needle/catheter placement (Stong)

5.3   Postoperative LMWH

5.3.1        We recommend against concomitant administration of medications affecting hemostasis, such as antiplatelet drugs, standard heparin, or dextran, regardless of LMWH dosing regimen when there is an indwelling neuraxial catheter (Strong)

5.3.2        Twice-daily low dose. We recommend the first dose of LMWH be administered the following day and at least 12 hours after needle/catheter placement. Indwelling catheters should be removed prior to initiation of LMWH. Administration of LMWH should be delayed for 4 hours after catheter removal (Strong)

5.3.3        Single daily low dose. We recommend the first postoperative LMWH dose should be administered at least 12 hours after needle/catheter placement. Indwelling neuraxial catheters do not appear to represent increased risk and may be maintained. The catheter should be removed 12 hours after the last dose of LMWH. Subsequent LMWH dosing should occur at least 4 hours after catheter removal (Strong)

5.3.4        Single or twice-daily high ( therapeutic ) dosing. High-dose LMWH may be resumed 24 hours after non-high-bleeding-risk surgery and 48–72 hours after high-bleeding-risk surgery. We recommend that indwelling neuraxial catheters be removed 4 hours prior to the first postoperative dose and the first postoperative dose should be at least 24 hours after needle/catheter placement, whichever is greater (Strong)

6.     Antiplatelet Medications

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking NSAIDs

6.1   NSAIDs appear to represent no added risk for the development of major bleeding after regional anesthetic techniques. NSAIDs (including aspirin) do not create a level of risk that will interfere with the performance of neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks. In patients receiving these medications, we do not identify specific concerns as to the timing of single-injection or catheter techniques, postoperative monitoring, or the timing of neuraxial catheter removal. (Strong)

6.2   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Thienopyridines (Clopidogrel, Prasugrel)

6.2.1        Based on labeling and surgical/procedural experience, the suggested time interval between discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy and needle placement is 5–7 days for clopidogrel, and 7–10 days for prasugrel (Conditional)

6.2.2        Neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral catheters should not be maintained with prasugrel due to the rapid onset. However, since the antiplatelet effect is not immediate with clopidogrel, they may be maintained for 1–2 days, provided a loading dose of the antiplatelet agent is not administered (Conditional)

6.2.3        Thienopyridine therapy may be resumed immediately after needle placement/catheter removal, provided a loading dose of the drugs is not administered. If a loading dose is administered, we suggest a time interval of 6 hours between catheter removal and administration (Conditional)

6.3   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Ticagrelor

6.3.1        Based on labeling and surgical/procedural experience, the recommended time interval between discontinuation of ticagrelor therapy and needle placement is 5 days (Conditional)

6.3.2        Neuraxial catheters should not be maintained with ticagrelor due to the rapid onset (Conditional)

6.3.3        Ticagrelor therapy may be resumed immediately after needle placement/catheter removal, provided a loading dose of the drug is not administered. If a loading dose is administered, we suggest a time interval of 6 hours between catheter removal and administration (Conditional)

6.4   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking platelet GP IIb/IIa inhibitors

6.4.1        The platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors exert a profound effect on platelet aggregation. Following administration, the time to normal platelet aggregation is 24–48 hours for abciximab and 4–8 hours for eptifibatide and tirofiban. We recommend that needle placement should be avoided until platelet function—as impacted by the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor—has recovered. Caution in patients on dual therapy who may still have residual NSAID effect (Strong)

6.4.2        Postoperative. Although GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are contraindicated within 4 weeks of surgery, should one be emergently administered in the postoperative period following a neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral technique, we recommend the neuraxial infusion should be limited to drugs minimizing sensory and motor block to facilitate assessment of neurological function and that the patient be carefully monitored neurologically (Strong)

6.4.3        Timing of catheter removal is based on ongoing risk of thromboembolism and need for continued antithrombotic therapy and the potential for spinal bleeding during catheter maintenance and removal (Conditional)

6.5   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Cilostazol

6.5.1        The risk of serious bleeding in the presence of residual cilostazol effect is unknown. Based on the elimination half-life, we suggest that needle placement be avoided for 2 days after discontinuation of cilostazol (Conditional)

6.5.2        We suggest that neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral catheters be removed prior to reinstitution of cilostazol therapy postoperatively (Conditional)

6.5.3        We suggest that the first postoperative dose of cilostazol be administered 6 hours after neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral catheter removal (Conditional)

6.6   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Cangrelor

6.6.1        The risk of serious bleeding in the presence of residual cangrelor effect is unknown. Based on the elimination half-life, we suggest that needle placement be avoided for 3 hours after discontinuation of cangrelor (Conditional)

6.6.2        We suggest that neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral catheters be removed prior to reinstitution of cangrelor therapy postoperatively (Conditional)

6.6.3        We suggest that the first postoperative dose of cangrelor be administered 8 hours after neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral catheter removal (Conditional)

7.     Parenteral Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking parenteral Thrombin inhibitors (Argatroban, Bivalirudin, and Desirudin)

7.1   In patients receiving parenteral thrombin inhibitors, we suggest against the performance of neuraxial techniques (Conditional)

              Parenteral anti-Xa agents

7.2   Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving Fondaparinux

                        Low-dose fondaparinux (2.5 mg once per day)

7.2.1        We suggest holding low-dose fondaparinux (2.5 mg once per day) for 36 hours (young patients) to 42 hours (elderly patients) in healthy patients with normal renal function (Conditional)

7.2.2        We suggest holding fondaparinux for a minimum of 58 hours in patients with moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl 30–50 mL/min) (Conditional)

7.2.3        We suggest not performing neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min) due to the 72 hours half-life (Conditional)

7.2.4        We suggest testing aXa activity calibrated to fondaparinux if placing the needle prior to these recommended times is considered (aXa ≤0.1 IU/mL) (Conditional)

                          High-dose fondaparinux (5–10 mg once per day)

7.2.5        We suggest holding high-dose fondaparinux (5-10 mg once per day) for a minimum of 70 hours (in young patients) and for a minimum of 105 hours (in elderly patients) with normal renal function (Conditional)

7.2.6        We suggest testing aXa activity calibrated to fondaparinux if placing needle prior to the recommended times is considered (aXa ≤0.1 IU/mL) (Conditional)

7.2.7        We suggest that neuraxial catheters be removed at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose (Conditional)

8.     Fibrinolytic and Thrombolytic drugs

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving Thrombolytic therapy

8.1   In patients scheduled to receive thrombolytic therapy, we recommend that the patient be queried, and the medical record reviewed for a recent history of lumbar puncture, spinal or epidural anesthesia, or epidural steroid injection to allow appropriate monitoring. Guidelines detailing original contraindications for thrombolytic drugs suggest avoidance of these drugs for 10 days following puncture of non-compressible vessels (Strong)

8.2   In patients who have received fibrinolytic and thrombolytic drugs, we recommend against needle placement for at least 48 hours. Documentation of normalization of clotting studies (including fibrinogen) is suggested (Strong)

8.3   In those patients who have received neuraxial blocks at or near the time of fibrinolytic and thrombolytic therapy, we recommend that frequent neurological monitoring (eg, every 2 hours) should be continued for at least 48 hours after the last dose. If neuraxial blocks have been combined with fibrinolytic and thrombolytic therapy and ongoing epidural catheter infusion, we recommend the infusion should be limited to drugs minimizing sensory and motor block to facilitate assessment of neurological function (Strong)

9.     Vitamin K antagonists (warfarin)

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient on Warfarin

9.1   We recommend that the anticoagulant therapy be stopped 5 days prior to the planned procedure, and the INR be measured and normalized (normal range of the local laboratory) prior to needle placement. (Strong)

9.2   In patients receiving an initial dose of warfarin prior to surgery, we suggest the INR should be checked prior to needle placement if the first dose was given >24 hours earlier, or if a second dose of oral anticoagulant has been administered (Conditional)

9.3   In patients receiving low-dose warfarin therapy during epidural analgesia, we suggest that their INR be monitored daily (Conditional)

9.4   We suggest that neuraxial catheters be removed when the INR is <1.5 (Conditional)

9.5   In patients with INR >1.5 but <3, the increased risk of maintaining a neuraxial catheter remains unknown. We suggest indwelling catheters may be maintained or removed with caution, closely following the INR and duration of warfarin therapy. (Conditional)

9.6   In patients with an INR >3, we recommend that the warfarin dose be held or reduced in patients with indwelling neuraxial catheters (Strong)

9.7   Neurological testing of sensory and motor function should be performed routinely during epidural analgesia for patients on warfarin therapy. To facilitate neurological evaluation, we recommend that the type of analgesic solution be tailored to minimize the degree of sensory and motor blockade (Strong)

9.8   We suggest that neurological assessment be continued for at least 48 hours following catheter removal (Conditional)

10.  Herbal medications

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in patients using Herbal therapy

10.1                    The use of herbal medications does not create a level of risk that will interfere with the performance of neuraxial blocks. We recommend against the mandatory discontinuation of these medications or avoidance of regional anesthetic techniques in patients on these medications (Strong)

11.  Management of neuraxial block in the anticoagulated parturient

11.1                  Given the limited pharmacological data on antithrombotic agents in pregnancy and in the absence of a large series of neuraxial techniques in the pregnant population receiving prophylaxis or treatment for venous thromboembolism, we suggest that the recommendations included in this document be applied to parturients (Conditional)

11.2                  However, in circumstances involving select high-risk parturients receiving VTE prophylaxis, and requiring urgent interventions for maternal or fetal indications, the risk of general anesthesia may be greater than neuraxial anesthesia, and exceptions/modifications of these recommendations may be appropriate (Conditional)

12.  Antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy

Management of deep plexus/peripheral block in the anticoagulated patient

12.1                  For patients undergoing deep plexus or deep peripheral block, we recommend that guidelines for neuraxial block be similarly applied (Strong)

12.2                  For patients undergoing other plexus or peripheral techniques, we suggest performance, catheter maintenance, and catheter removal be based on site compressibility, vascularity, and consequences of bleeding, should it occur (Conditional)

- RECOMMENDATIONS

These Guidelines deal with the cornerstone steps of Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy.

The main source of these guidelines is : Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA PM) Evidence-Based Guidelines (fifth edition) January 2025 [1].

1.     Administration of thromboprophylaxis

1.1 For each of the antithrombotic agents, we suggest that clinicians follow the FDA-approved dosing guidelines. (Conditional, High evidence)

*FDA Drug Labeling for individual antithrombotic agents provides the primary evidence base for dosing safety and pharmacokinetics used by guideline panels. Following FDA-approved dosing reduces risk of excess anticoagulant effect, spinal/epidural hematoma and bleeding complications and also promotes standardized, evidence-based prescribing.

**Narouze, et al. (ASRA/ESRA consensus) [6] recommends adherence to FDA labeling when managing antithrombotics around neuraxial/interventional procedures. Horlocker, et al. [4] Emphasizes use of manufacturer/FDA dosing and timing due to bleeding risk with neuraxial techniques. On 2024, a literature review of 940 spinal hematoma cases finds that most are spontaneous across all populations, with some linked to anticoagulants, trauma, or neuraxial procedures [7].

The agent, dosing regimen, and duration of thromboprophylaxis is based on identification of risk factors, both individual (eg, age, gender, history of thromboembolism) and group-specific (eg, primary reason for hospitalization, surgery, medical illness) [8].  (Appendix, Table 1) Depending on the risks of thromboembolism and bleeding, thromboprophylaxis may be achieved with intermittent compression devices, with medications, or a combination of both. A logical approach to VTE prophylaxis begins with individualized risk assessment. Several well-validated risk assessment tools are available for individualized patient-specific guidance including both medical and surgical indications. For patients hospitalized with a medical condition, the PADUA [9] and IMPROVE [10] risk tools provide a well-validated framework for assessing which patients will most benefit from VTE prophylaxis. (Appendix, Table 2) Similar risk assessment tools are available for the surgical patient population. The Caprini and Rogers tools assign risk based on a number of surgery-specific and other clinical variables [11].

2.    Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)

2.1  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a High dose of Apixaban (Eliquis)

2.1.1       We suggest that a high dose of apixaban be discontinued at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking apixaban or aXa plasma level if <72 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.1.2       We suggest that a residual apixaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.1.3       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.2  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a Low dose of Apixaban (Eliquis)

2.2.1       We suggest that a low dose of apixaban be discontinued for at least 36 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking apixaban or aXa plasma level if <36 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.2.2       We suggest that a residual apixaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.2.3       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.3  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a high dose of edoxaban (Savaysa)

We suggest that a high dose of edoxaban be discontinued for at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking edoxaban or aXa activity plasma level if <72 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.3.1       We suggest that a residual edoxaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.3.2       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first (postoperative) dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.4  Management of the patient receiving a Low dose of Edoxaban (Savaysa)

              There is no FDA-approved medical indication for low-dose edoxaban.

2.5  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving High dose of Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)

2.5.1       We suggest that a high dose of rivaroxaban be discontinued for at least 72 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking rivaroxaban or aXa activity plasma level if <72 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.5.2       We suggest that a residual rivaroxaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.5.3       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.6  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a Low dose of Rivaroxaban (Xarelto)

2.6.1       We suggest that a low dose of rivaroxaban be discontinued for at least 24 hours (30 hours if CrCl <30 mL/min) prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking rivaroxaban or aXa activity plasma level if <24 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.6.2       We suggest that a residual rivaroxaban plasma level <30 ng/mL or a residual aXa activity plasma level ≤0.1 IU/mL ¹ is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.6.3       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.7  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a High dose of Dabigatran (Pradaxa)

2.7.1       We suggest that a high dose of dabigatran be discontinued for at least 72 hours in patients with a CrCl ≥50 mL/min prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/ peripheral block. Consider checking dabigatran plasma level if <72 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.7.2       We suggest that a high dose of dabigatran be discontinued for 120 hours in patients with a CrCl 30–49 mL/min prior to neuraxial block or deep. plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking dabigatran plasma level if <120 hours.(Conditional, Low evidence)

2.7.3       We suggest against the performance of neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients with a CrCl <30 mL/min unless a dabigatran plasma level is obtained and <30 ng/mL. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.7.4       Prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block we suggest that a residual dabigatran plasma level <30 ng/mL is acceptable. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.7.5       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 24 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.8  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving a Low dose of Dabigatran (Pradaxa)

2.8.1       We suggest that a low dose of dabigatran be discontinued for at least 48 hours prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block. Consider checking dabigatran plasma level if <48 hours. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.8.2       We suggest that a residual dabigatran plasma level <30 ng/mL is acceptable prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.8.3       We suggest against the performance of neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients with a CrCl <30 mL/min unless a dabigatran plasma level is obtained and <30 ng/mL. (Conditional, Low evidence)

2.8.4       We suggest that needle placement/catheter removal occurs at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*In previous versions of the guidelines, the anticoagulant doses were described as prophylactic and therapeutic. Recent guidelines [1] using ‘low dose’ and ‘high dose,’ allowed the authors to be consistent with other published guidelines and more accurately describe the dose in the setting of specific patient characteristics and indications. A table showing the ‘low’ and ‘high’ doses of the various DOACs and their indications are shown in the Appendix, Table 3.

** The recent large international, multicenter “The Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation” (PAUSE) trial reported the residual DOAC plasma levels after high doses of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, in 3007 patients with Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), immediately prior to an invasive procedure [12]. 

***Both the ACCP and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) recommend that the postoperative resumption of DOAC therapy, irrespective of the dose used, be delayed for 24 hours after a procedure with a low/moderate bleeding risk, and for 48–72 hours after a procedure with high bleeding risk, and only to be administered when adequate surgical hemostasis has been accomplished [1,13]. In the interim, a prophylactic/low-dose anticoagulant, such as LMWH or UFH, can be considered in patients at high thrombotic risk [1,13].

† The most recent guidelines on VTE prophylaxis from the ACCP [1] and the ESAIC [14,15] were helpful to recommend the timing to resume a DOAC treatment after a neuraxial intervention (ie, the removal of the neuraxial catheter). VTE prophylaxis (ie, low dose) should be resumed/started 6 hours postoperatively, while therapeutic anticoagulation should be restarted ≥24 hours postoperatively [14,15].

 In 2007, Rosencher et al recommended that the next/first postoperative dose of an antithrombotic agent to be administered ≥6 hours; i.e., 8 hours (the time needed for an initial platelet plug to solidify) minus T_max (the onset time of a drug, which is 2–3 hours for the DOACs) after surgery [16]. †† The most recent European guidelines were a collaborative effort of both the ESAIC and the ESRA and were published in February 2022 [5].

The anticoagulant effect of DXAs can be reliably measured using drug-specific, calibrated anti-X activity (aXa) assays [12,17-19]. A non-detectable anticoagulant effect is defined as a drug-specific threshold plasma level <30 ng/mL [12, 18]. If drug-specific calibrated aXa assays are not available, a clinically relevant DXA effect can be ruled out by the use of UFH-calibrated or LMWH-calibrated chromogenic aXa assays [17,20]. In these cases, an aXa activity of 0.1 IU/mL or less is considered to be an undetectable anticoagulant effect [12,17-19]. The availability of these tests throughout the USA and the rest of the world is presently unreliable. We provide recommendations and threshold values with the hope that these tests become more routine and the results more immediate.  

Although never clinically validated [17,18], most experts and international anesthesiology societies consider a DOAC plasma level <30 ng/mL as a safe hemostatic threshold [21] to avoid bleeding. Recent prospective data have become available on the residual anticoagulant effect following a standardized preoperative interruption of high doses of DOACs.

In the previous guidelines, the pharmacokinetic properties and expert opinion were key elements to recommend therapy-free time intervals to enable the safe performance of a neuraxial or deep plexus intervention in patients treated with a DOAC. A neuraxial anesthetic intervention is considered a high bleeding risk procedure as bleeding would have important consequences not so much in terms of blood loss, but mainly in terms of a neurological deficit caused by bleeding into a confined space [13, 22]. It is therefore recommended that a complete return of normal hemostasis is required before any neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral block is performed.

3.     Use of Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) antidotes to facilitate placement of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block

3.1  Suggest against the use of idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC), or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) to reverse DOAC anticoagulant activity to enable the safe performance of a neuraxial intervention in routine patients (Conditional, Low evidence)

*Andexanet alfa (Andexxa) is a recombinant protein that is indicated in patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban, where reversal of anticoagulation is needed due to life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding.

Whether or not the remaining plasma levels of aXa activity after andexanet alfa administration are predictive of the risk of a neuraxial bleeding still remains unclear. In addition, current commercial aXa assays are unsuitable for measuring the remaining factor Xa activity following administration of andexanet alfa [23]. Finally, re-elevation or incomplete reversal of anticoagulant activity may occur because of andexanet alfa’s short terminal half-life (ie, 5–7 hours) and its ability to displace DXAs from the extravascular to the intravascular compartment [24].

**Idarucizumab (Praxbind) is a humanized monoclonal antibody fragment. In October 2015, idarucizumab was approved by the FDA to be used in adult patients treated with dabigatran, when rapid reversal of its anticoagulant effects is required in situations of emergency surgery/urgent procedures or life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding [25]. Also, there are no controlled investigations on the use of reversal agents specifically aimed at neuraxial anesthetic techniques.

***The use of procoagulant agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) may be an option if specific antidotes for the reversal of the DOACs are not available or are too costly [1, 13]. observational studies (some retrospective) have shown the efficacy of PPC or aPCC in DOAC-treated patients who were actively bleeding [26]. There are no data evaluating the use of PCC or aPCC for reversal in patients treated with DOACs and planned for a neuraxial intervention. If surgery can be postponed allowing spontaneous recovery of normal hemostasis, discontinuation of the antithrombotic drug is the preferred strategy. If waiting is not an option and reversal is needed for the safe conduct of the surgery itself, regional anesthetic techniques may be considered after full dabigatran reversal by idarucizumab.

4.    Intravenous and Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving Unfractionated Heparin.

4.1  We recommend daily review of the patient’s medical record to determine the concurrent use of medications that affect other pathways of hemostasis. These medications include antiplatelet medications, LMWH, and oral anticoagulants (Strong, Moderate evidence)

*Supporting evidence cited by ASRA PM (Fifth edition) [1] included case series linking neuraxial hematoma to multiple hemostasis-altering drugs, pharmacologic data showing additive anticoagulant effects and National and international hematoma registries.

** This recommendation was based on expert consensus emphasizing patient safety and prevention of neuraxial hematoma. Three factors associated with the increased risk of hematoma were identified: <60 min time interval between the administration of heparin and lumbar puncture, traumatic needle placement, and concomitant use of aspirin. These risk factors have been verified in subsequent large reviews of case reports of hematomas associated with neuraxial procedures in the presence of Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) [27,28]

4.2  Since heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may occur during heparin administration, we recommend that patients receiving intravenous or subcutaneous UFH for >4 days have a platelet count assessed (Strong, Low evidence)

*Platelet count monitoring is inexpensive and noninvasive → therefore ASRA PM [1] issued a strong recommendation despite low-quality evidence. HIT incidence with UFH ≈ 0.1–5%, highest after day 4, And complication risk (thrombosis) can reach 30–50% if untreated.

**There is a subset of patients who will develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) after being on heparin for >5 days, resulting in a decreased platelet count [29]. For this reason, patients receiving intravenous or subcutaneous UFH for >4 days should have a platelet count assessed prior to neuraxial block or catheter removal. While the typical onset of HIT occurs within 5–14 days following heparin initiation, patients with a recent heparin exposure within the past 30 days may develop rapid-onset HIT on heparin re-exposure [30,31]. Thrombocytopenia, on re-presentation, may be mild to moderate. Importantly, heparin re-exposure may worsen clinical outcomes.

4.3    Intravenous heparin

4.3.1       Discontinue Intravenous heparin infusion for a minimum of 4–6 hours and coagulation status be assessed and normal prior to neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block (Strong, High evidence)

4.3.2       Delay intravenous heparin administration for a minimum of 1 hour after needle placement (Strong, High evidence)

4.3.3       It is not recommended to maintain neuraxial or deep plexus catheters in the setting of continuous intravenous heparin administration. In the event of unanticipated heparinization, we recommend monitoring the patient with an indwelling catheter to allow for early detection of motor deficits and consider use of minimal concentration of local anesthetics to enhance early detection of a neuraxial hematoma (Strong, High evidence)

4.3.4       Although the occurrence of a bloody or difficult neuraxial needle placement may increase the risk of hematoma, there are no data to support mandatory cancellation of a case. Direct communication with the surgeon and a specific risk-benefit decision about proceeding in each case is recommended (Strong, High evidence)

*Intraoperative heparinization typically involves injection of 5000–10 000 units of heparin IV during the operative period, particularly in the setting of vascular surgery to prevent coagulation during cross-clamping of arterial vessels[32]. Neuraxial anesthetic techniques may be considered for these patients, but the increased risk of neuraxial hematoma, as demonstrated by case series, epidemiological surveys, and the ASA Closed Claims database needs to be considered [33-35]. 

* According to ASRA PM guidelines (fifth edition) [1], maintaining a minimum 1-hour interval between needle placement and heparinization, as well as avoiding other hemostasis-altering medications, decreases the risk of significant bleeding.

**Heparinization may be continued into or initiated in the postoperative period. However, the removal of a neuraxial catheter in the presence of heparin therapy increases the risk of hematoma formation. In a series by Vandermeulen et al, half of the spinal hematomas associated with intravenous heparinization were detected at the time of catheter removal [34]. The risk of hematoma resulting from catheter removal has led to the recommendation that in patients who have undergone systemic heparinization, the heparin should be discontinued for 4–6 hours and the coagulation status assessed prior to neuraxial catheter manipulation or removal [3].

**Management of a traumatic neuraxial procedure must also be considered. Previous case reports suggest that presence of a bloody tap or a traumatic regional block was an associated factor in approximately 50% of spinal hematomas [34]. Although some investigators have recommended cancellation of the surgical procedures if these events occur [36], there are no clinical data to support this recommendation [37]. Direct communication with the surgeon and a specific risk-benefit decision about proceeding in each case is recommended.

Heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass

4.3.5       It is not recommended to maintain neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral catheters in the setting of full anticoagulation during cardiac surgery. If unanticipated heparinization occurs, we suggest postoperative monitoring of neurological status and consider use of minimal concentration of local anesthetics to enhance early detection of neuraxial hematoma. (Conditional, Low)

*To date, there is a single case of spinal hematoma following the full heparinization associated with cardiopulmonary bypass [38]. However, these series involve small numbers of patients. Using a mathematical analysis of the probability of predicting a rare event and based on the total of 4583 epidural and 10 840 spinal anesthetics reported without complications, Ho et al estimated the risk of hematoma to be approximately 1:1528 for epidural and 1:3610 for spinal technique [39]. Thus, this analgesic technique remains controversial in that the risk appears too great for the perceived benefits. Neuraxial anesthetics are therefore not recommended in the setting of high-dose anticoagulation and cardiopulmonary bypass. 

4.4    Subcutaneous heparin

4.4.1       Preoperative low-dose UFH for thromboprophylaxis (5000 U two times per day or three times per day). We suggest needle placement occur a minimum of 4–6 hours after heparin administration or coagulation status be assessed and normal. (Conditional, Low evidence)

4.4.2       Preoperative high dose UFH

7500–10 000 U two times per day or a daily dose of ≤20 000 U

We suggest neuraxial block occur a minimum of 12 hours after subcutaneous heparin administration and confirmation of normal coagulation status. (Conditional, Low evidence)

>10 000 U subcutaneously per dose, or >20 000 U total daily dose

We suggest neuraxial block occur a minimum of 24 hours after subcutaneous heparin administration and confirmation of normal coagulation status. (Conditional, Low evidence)

4.4.3       Postoperative low-dose UFH

There is no contraindication to maintaining neuraxial catheters in the presence of low-dose UFH. We suggest catheter removal occurs a minimum of 4–6 hours after heparin administration. Subsequent heparin administration may occur immediately after catheter removal. (Conditional, Low evidence)

4.4.4       Postoperative high-dose UFH

The safety of indwelling neuraxial catheters in patients receiving doses >5000 U at a time or >15 000 U of UFH daily has not been established. We suggest that the risk and benefits be assessed on an individual basis and that techniques to facilitate detection of new/progressive neurological deficits (eg, enhanced neurological monitoring occur and neuraxial solutions to minimize sensory and motor block) be applied. (Conditional, Low evidence)

Administration of 5000 units of heparin subcutaneously 2 or 3 times daily has been used extensively and is effective for prophylaxis against DVT. However, approximately 15% of patients may develop measurable changes in coagulation, with the aPTT rarely exceeding 1.5 times the normal level and normalizing within 4–6 hours after administration [40]. 

*The widespread use of SC heparin and the paucity of complications suggest that there is little risk of spinal hematoma associated with this therapy. There are 10 published series totaling over 12 000 patients who have received this therapy without complications. Three series, with a combined total of over 7000 patients who received epidural analgesia in the presence of 5000 units of heparin three times a day, reported no spinal hematomas [41-43]. There are only five case reports of neuraxial hematomas: four epidural [34, 44], and one spinal [45], during neuraxial block with the use of subcutaneous heparin.

**The safety of high-dose subcutaneous UFH (doses >5000 units or total daily dose >15 000 units) remains controversial due to the marked variability in patient response to these dosing regimens. According to ASRA PM guidelines (fifth edition) [1] timing of assessment of coagulation status for residual heparin effect is based on dose and frequency of dosing. For example, for individual heparin dose of 7500–10 000 U two times per day or a daily dose of ≤20 000 U, it is suggested neuraxial block occur 12 hours after subcutaneous heparin administration and assessment of coagulation status with a normal aPTT. Likewise, for individual heparin dose >10 000 U subcutaneously per dose, or >20 000 U total daily dose, it is suggested neuraxial block occurs 24 hours after subcutaneous heparin administration and assessment of coagulation status with a normal aPTT [3].

5.     Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH)

5.1  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving low molecular weight heparin

5.1.1       The aXa level is Not predictive of the risk of bleeding, although it may be useful in monitoring efficacy of therapy with high-dose regimens. We recommend against the routine use of aXa level monitoring. (Strong, Low evidence)

5.1.2       Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia may occur during LMWH administration; therefore, we recommend that patients receiving LMWH for >4 days have a platelet count assessed prior to needle placement. (Strong, Low evidence)

5.1.3       The presence of blood during needle and catheter placement does not necessitate postponement of surgery. We suggest that initiation of LMWH therapy in this setting should be delayed for 24 hours postoperatively and that this consideration be discussed with the surgeon. (Strong, Low evidence)

*The anticoagulant effect of LMWH is most readily assessed by the aXa activity. Because of reduced protamine binding to LMWH fractions, only the anti-IIa activity of LMWH is completely reversed; the aXa activity is not fully neutralized. Both anti-IIa and aXa activity may return up to 3 hours after protamine reversal [46]. The aXa level above which is associated with significant bleeding risk remains unknown. An aXa level of ≤0.1 IU/mL is considered an undetectable anticoagulant effect [17-19].

5.2  Preoperative LMWH

5.2.1       In patients receiving low-dose LMWH, we recommend delay of at least 12 hours prior to needle/catheter placement. (Stong, Low evidence)

5.2.2       In patients receiving high (therapeutic) doses of LMWH, we recommend delay of at least 24 hours prior to needle/catheter placement. (Stong, Low evidence)

*Consistent expert consensus from ASRA [1] and ESAIC/European Society of Anesthesiology (ESA), Pharmacokinetic data, Large observational series and FDA safety data. The 12 hours (for prophylactic dose corresponds to decline of anti-Xa activity to safer levels while the 24 hours (therapeutic dosing) produces higher and more sustained anti-Xa levels. With high-dose LMWH, it is recommended that the last dose should occur at least 24 hours preoperatively and the last dose should be halved in patients with moderate (CrCl 30–49 mL/min) to severe (CrCl <30 mL/min) renal insufficiency to avoid an exaggerated or prolonged response [47].

5.3  Postoperative LMWH

5.3.1       We recommend against concomitant administration of medications affecting hemostasis, such as antiplatelet drugs, standard heparin, or dextran, regardless of LMWH dosing regimen when there is an indwelling neuraxial catheter. (Strong, High evidence)

*ASRA PM guidelines (fifth edition) [1] states that antiplatelet or oral anticoagulant medications administered in combination with LMWH increases the risk of neuraxial hematoma and recommends against concomitant administration of medications affecting hemostasis, such as antiplatelet drugs, standard heparin, or dextran, regardless of LMWH dosing regimen when there is an indwelling neuraxial catheter.

**High-quality evidence based on accumulated clinical data, pharmacologic rationale, and observational reports of increased neuraxial hematoma risk with combined anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. The additive, if not synergistic effect of multiple hemostasis-altering medications cannot be overstated and may elevate the risk of hematoma in once-daily LMWH dosing to that of twice-daily dosing [33].

5.3.2       Twice-daily low dose. We recommend the first dose of LMWH be administered the following day and at least 12 hours after needle/catheter placement. Indwelling catheters should be removed prior to initiation of LMWH. Administration of LMWH should be delayed for 4 hours after catheter removal. (Strong, Low evidence)

5.3.3       Single daily low dose. We recommend the first postoperative LMWH dose should be administered at least 12 hours after needle/catheter placement. Indwelling neuraxial catheters do not appear to represent increased risk and may be maintained. The catheter should be removed 12 hours after the last dose of LMWH. Subsequent LMWH dosing should occur at least 4 hours after catheter removal. (Strong, Low evidence)

5.3.4       Single or twice-daily high ( therapeutic ) dosing. High-dose LMWH may be resumed 24 hours after non-high-bleeding-risk surgery and 48–72 hours after high-bleeding-risk surgery. We recommend that indwelling neuraxial catheters be removed 4 hours prior to the first postoperative dose and the first postoperative dose should be at least 24 hours after needle/catheter placement, whichever is greater. (Strong, Low evidence)

*Some observational studies indicate that a significant number of patients will have detectable aXa levels (>0.1 IU/mL) and some may have levels in the prophylactic and possibly therapeutic ranges. It is difficult to know whether this correlates with an increased risk of neuraxial hematoma. North American recommendations have drawn on the extensive European experience in the development of practice guidelines for the management of patients undergoing spinal and epidural blocks while receiving perioperative LMWH. A small quality improvement publication involving 19 patients found that almost 60% of patients taking high-dose enoxaparin still have higher than expected aXa levels a minimum of 24 hours after the last dose. They also suggested that patients with lower CrCl and increased age may be at particular risk [48]. Finally, a 2023 prospective observational trial of 103 patients concluded that the time from the last high-dose administration until the aXa level fell below 0.2 IU/mL was 31.5 hours [49]. 

**The ESAIC/European Society of Anesthesiology (ESA) recommend that with either low-dose or high-dose LMWH, the time interval be doubled between last dose of LMWH or the dose halved in the presence of severe renal insufficiency (CrCl <30 mL/min) [5]. Although the recommendation is against routine testing, assessment of residual aXa activity may be considered in patients who are elderly, morbidly obese [50], or patients with severe renal insufficiency, noting that the acceptable level of residual aXa level for performance of neuraxial block remains undetermined and therefore a level ≤0.1 IU/mL is suggested.

6.    Antiplatelet medications

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking NSAIDs

6.1  NSAIDs appear to represent no added risk for the development of major bleeding after regional anesthetic techniques. NSAIDs (including aspirin) do not create a level of risk that will interfere with the performance of neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks. In patients receiving these medications, we do not identify specific concerns as to the timing of single-injection or catheter techniques, postoperative monitoring, or the timing of neuraxial catheter removal (Strong, Low evidence)

*ASRA PM (fifth ed.) [1] uses strong language indicating clinicians can proceed with neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients taking NSAIDs (including aspirin).

**Several large studies have demonstrated the relative safety of central neural blockade in combination with NSAID therapy, although the total number of patients in this combined series is only 4714 [51]. If low-dose aspirin creates the greatest impact on platelet function, patients receiving 60–325 mg aspirin would theoretically represent the greatest risk of significant bleeding. However, this is not noted in the literature [52]. An exception to this are patients undergoing invasive pain procedures [6,53].

NSAIDs inhibit platelet cyclooxygenase and prevent the synthesis of thromboxane A2. Platelet cyclooxygenase is inhibited by low-dose aspirin (60–325 mg/day) while larger doses (1.5–2 g/day) will also inhibit the production of prostacyclin (a potent vasodilator and platelet aggregation inhibitor) by vascular endothelial cells and thus result in a paradoxical thrombogenic effect [54]. As a result, low-dose aspirin (81–325 mg/day) is theoretically a greater risk factor for bleeding than higher doses. There is consensus that the optimal dose of aspirin for prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death lies within the narrow range of 75–160 mg/day [55].

Platelet function is affected for the life of the platelet following aspirin ingestion; other non-steroidal analgesics (naproxen, piroxicam, ibuprofen) produce a short-term defect, which normalizes within 3 days [56]. Celecoxib (Celebrex) is an anti-inflammatory agent that primarily inhibits cyclooxygenase-2, an inducible enzyme which is not expressed in platelets, and thus does not cause platelet dysfunction [57].

6.2  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Thienopyridines (Clopidogrel, Prasugrel)

6.2.1       Based on labeling and surgical/procedural experience, the suggested time interval between discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy and needle placement is 5–7 days for clopidogrel, and 7–10 days for prasugrel. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.2.2       Neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral catheters should not be maintained with prasugrel due to the rapid onset. However, since the antiplatelet effect is not immediate with clopidogrel, they may be maintained for 1–2 days, provided a loading dose of the antiplatelet agent is not administered. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.2.3       Thienopyridine therapy may be resumed immediately after needle placement/catheter removal, provided a loading dose of the drugs is not administered. If a loading dose is administered, we suggest a time interval of 6 hours between catheter removal and administration. (Conditional, Low evidence)

The antiplatelet effect of the thienopyridine derivatives, clopidogrel (Plavix) and prasugrel (Efient) results from inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Thienopyridine derivatives demonstrate both time-dependent and dose-dependent effects.

*No prospective studies have evaluated perioperative management of clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Retrospective studies suggest an increased risk of bleeding with clopidogrel continued perioperatively [58].  Based on expert opinion (recommendation made with ‘very low certainty of evidence’) the ACCP [58] recommends that if a patient is to undergo an elective procedure and an antiplatelet effect is not desired, therapy with clopidogrel should be interrupted ‘for 5 days prior to surgery [59] and prasugrel discontinued at least 7 days prior to any surgery [60]. 

However, these time intervals are not sufficient to have a return to baseline activity in all patients who displayed residual effects beyond these intervals and a longer time interval, such as 7 days for clopidogrel and 9 days for prasugrel may be desirable to further mitigate any potential bleeding risk [61]. Based on European labeling, the ESAIC/ERSA recommends 5–7 days for clopidogrel and 7 days for prasugrel [5].

6.3  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Ticagrelor

6.3.1       Based on labeling and surgical/procedural experience, the recommended time interval between discontinuation of ticagrelor therapy and needle placement is 5 days. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.3.2       Neuraxial catheters should not be maintained with ticagrelor due to the rapid onset. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.3.3       Ticagrelor therapy may be resumed immediately after needle placement/catheter removal, provided a loading dose of the drug is not administered. If a loading dose is administered, we suggest a time interval of 6 hours between catheter removal and administration. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*Based on expert opinion (recommendation made with ‘very low certainty of evidence’), the ACCP [1] recommends that ticagrelor be discontinued 3–5 days prior to surgery, while the ESAIC/ESRA based on European labeling recommends a 5-day interval [5].

Ticagrelor (Brilinta) represents a new class of non-thienopyridine platelet inhibitors Ticagrelor completely reversibly inhibits ADP-induced platelet activation, unlike the thienopyridines. Ticagrelor also acts directly on the P2Y12 receptor and does not require cytochrome P450 biotransformation. After a loading dose of Ticagrelor, an antiplatelet effect is observed within 30 min, while maximum effect is achieved within 2 hours. After discontinuation, platelet function recovers 70% in 3 days and to baseline in 5 days [62,63]. Labeling recommends to interrupt therapy with ticagrelor for 5 days prior to surgery that has a major risk of bleeding [64].

6.4  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking platelet GP IIb/IIa inhibitors

6.4.1       The platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors exert a profound effect on platelet aggregation. Following administration, the time to normal platelet aggregation is 24–48 hours for abciximab and 4–8 hours for eptifibatide and tirofiban. We recommend that needle placement should be avoided until platelet function - as impacted by the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor - has recovered. Caution in patients on dual therapy who may still have residual NSAID effect. (Strong, Low evidence)

6.4.2       Postoperative. Although GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are contraindicated within 4 weeks of surgery, should one be emergently administered in the postoperative period following a neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral technique, we recommend the neuraxial infusion should be limited to drugs minimizing sensory and motor block to facilitate assessment of neurological function and that the patient be carefully monitored neurologically. (Strong, Low evidence)

6.4.3       Timing of catheter removal is based on ongoing risk of thromboembolism and need for continued antithrombotic therapy and the potential for spinal bleeding during catheter maintenance and removal (Conditional, Low evidence)

Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, inhibit platelet aggregation by interfering with platelet-fibrinogen and platelet-von Willebrand factor binding. The majority of clinical trials involving the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists have evaluated their use in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome, and thus the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are typically administered in combination with aspirin and heparin. Contraindications include a history of surgery within 4–6 weeks [65]. Time to normal platelet aggregation following discontinuation of therapy ranges from 8 hours (eptifibatide, tirofiban) to 24–48 hours (abciximab) [55]. Thrombocytopenia is a known side effect [55].  

* ASRA PM (fifth edition) expert consensus,  included these recommendations, but ACCP and ESAIC/ESRA did not include recommendations for platelet GP IIb/IIIa because these medications are rarely administered to patients undergoing regional anesthesia/surgery [5, 58].

6.5  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Cilostazol

6.5.1       The risk of serious bleeding in the presence of residual cilostazol effect is unknown. Based on the elimination half-life, we suggest that needle placement be avoided for 2 days after discontinuation of cilostazol. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.5.2       We suggest that neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral catheters be removed prior to reinstitution of cilostazol therapy postoperatively. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.5.3       We suggest that the first postoperative dose of cilostazol be administered 6 hours after neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral catheter removal. (Conditional, Low evidence)

* Small perioperative observational data sets cited in ASRA review expert consensus for these recommendations, but ACCP and ESAIC/ESRA did not include recommendations for cilostazol because the medication is rarely administered to patients undergoing regional anesthesia/surgery [5, 58].

Cilostazol produces a selective inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) IIIA resulting in a weak, reversible inhibition of platelet aggregation. It has a half-life of 11 hours, which is prolonged in patients with severe renal impairment[55]. The terminal half-life and the active metabolite is 21 hours. There are limited data on perioperative administration of cilostazol. However, a single case report of spinal hematoma following epidural catheter removal in the presence of cilostazol therapy has been reported [66]. 

6.6  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking Cangrelor

6.6.1       The risk of serious bleeding in the presence of residual cangrelor effect is unknown. Based on the elimination half-life, we suggest that needle placement be avoided for 3 hours after discontinuation of cangrelor. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.6.2       We suggest that neuraxial and deep plexus/peripheral catheters be removed prior to reinstitution of cangrelor therapy postoperatively. (Conditional, Low evidence)

6.6.3       We suggest that the first postoperative dose of cangrelor be administered 8 hours after neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral catheter removal. (Conditional, Low evidence)

* ASRA MD (fifth edition) review expert consenus is based primarily on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Very limited clinical experience with neuraxial techniques and absence of large prospective safety trials. ACCP and ESAIC/ESRA did not include recommendations for cangrelor because the medication is rarely administered to patients undergoing regional anesthesia/surgery [5, 58].

Cangrelor (Kengreal) is a direct and reversible intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor. The dosage of the drug is 30 μg/kg bolus followed by a 4 μg/kg/min infusion. Its antiplatelet effect is seen within 2 min of administration and inhibits platelet aggregation by 95%–100%. Its plasma half-life is 3–6 min and platelet recovery is rapid; 80% and 90% of the samples recover in 60 and 90 min, respectively [67].

The oral P2Y12 inhibitors are discontinued for 5–10 days before surgery. Cangrelor can therefore be used as a bridge therapy in these situations. It is possible that perioperative anesthesiologists will encounter this scenario more often in the future. In these cases, a 3-hour interval minimum, and preferably longer should be observed.

7.    Parenteral Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

7.1  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient taking parenteral thrombin inhibitors (Argatroban, Bivalirudin, and Desirudin)

In patients receiving parenteral thrombin inhibitors, we suggest against the performance of neuraxial techniques. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*Recommendation of ASRA is conservative due to very limited evidence [1]. ASRA advises avoidance as the high potential harm (catastrophic neurologic injury) greatly outweighs the unproven benefit of neuraxial anesthesia in this setting.

 **Although there are no case reports of spinal hematoma related to neuraxial anesthesia among patients who have received an intravenous thrombin inhibitor, spontaneous intracranial bleeding has been reported. The lack of information available and the approved applications of these agents (typically patients with HIT who will need therapeutic levels of anticoagulation) make patients receiving these medications poor candidates for neuraxial blockade.

Recombinant hirudin derivatives, including bivalirudin (Angiomax), and desirudin (Revasc) inhibit both free and clot-bound thrombin. Argatroban (Acova), an L-arginine derivative, has a similar mechanism of action. These medications are indicated for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis in patients with HIT and as an adjunct to angioplasty procedures [68,69]. Desirudin is approved for prevention of VTE/PE following hip replacement [70]. The anticoagulant effect of thrombin inhibitors is monitored by the aPTT, and is present for 1–3 hours after intravenous administration. Hemorrhagic complications, particularly when combined with thrombolytic or antiplatelet agents, may be life threatening. There is no ‘antidote’; therefore, the antithrombin effect cannot be reversed pharmacologically.

Parenteral anti-Xa agents

7.2  Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving fondaparinux

                Low-dose fondaparinux (2.5 mg once per day)

7.2.1       We suggest holding low-dose fondaparinux (2.5 mg once per day) for 36 hours (young patients) to 42 hours (elderly patients) in healthy patients with normal renal function. (Conditional, Low evidence)

7.2.2       We suggest holding fondaparinux for a minimum of 58 hours in patients with moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl 30–50 mL/min). (Conditional, Low evidence)

7.2.3       We suggest not performing neuraxial or deep plexus/peripheral blocks in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min) due to the 72 hours half-life. (Conditional, Low evidence)

7.2.4       We suggest testing aXa activity calibrated to fondaparinux if placing the needle prior to these recommended times is considered (aXa ≤0.1 IU/mL). (Conditional, Low evidence)

                     High-dose fondaparinux (5–10 mg once per day)

7.2.5       We suggest holding high-dose fondaparinux (5-10 mg once per day) for a minimum of 70 hours (in young patients) and for a minimum of 105 hours (in elderly patients) with normal renal function. (Conditional, Low evidence)

7.2.6       We suggest testing aXa activity calibrated to fondaparinux if placing needle prior to the recommended times is considered (aXa ≤0.1 IU/mL). (Conditional, Low evidence)

7.2.7       We suggest that neuraxial catheters be removed at least 6 hours prior to the first postoperative dose. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*Recommendations of ASRA [1] are based on the long half-life, the irreversible anti-Xa activity and the lack of specific reversal agent. There are no robust randomized safety trials of neuraxial anesthesia with fondaparinux.

**One spinal hematoma was reported in the initial dose-ranging study, at a dose that was determined to be twice that required for thromboprophylaxis[71,72]. A series of 1631 patients undergoing continuous neuraxial or deep peripheral block reported no serious hemorrhagic complications. However, the catheters were removed 36 hours after the last dose of fondaparinux and subsequent dosing was delayed for 12 hours after catheter removal [73].

The FDA released fondaparinux with a black box warning about neuraxial anesthesia like that of the LMWHs and heparinoids. Fondaparinux produces its antithrombotic effect through factor Xa inhibition and is used when patients are intolerant to LMWH. Advantages of fondaparinux include: 100% bioavailability subcutaneously, instant onset of action, long half-life, and direct renal excretion [74]. This drug is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min) and in patients weighing <50 kg. It should be used with caution in patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl 30–50 mL/min). The plasma half-life of fondaparinux is 17–21 hours (17 hours in healthy, young patients and 21 hours in healthy, elderly patients), allowing for single daily dosing, with the first low (prophylactic) dose administered 6–8 hours postoperatively [71]. The half-life in patients with moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl 30–50 mL/min) was found to be 29 hours, and 72 hours in patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min). Routine coagulation tests such as PT and aPTT are relatively insensitive measures of fondaparinux and are unsuitable for monitoring. The aXa activity can be measured by aXa assay using the appropriate calibrator (fondaparinux). It is important to note that protamine would not be an effective reversal strategy. There is a paucity of prospective data and the studies that are published included such strict parameters that it is difficult to use them to develop recommendations.

8.     Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient receiving Thrombolytic therapy

8.1  In patients scheduled to receive thrombolytic therapy, we recommend that the patient be queried, and the medical record reviewed for a recent history of lumbar puncture, spinal or epidural anesthesia, or epidural steroid injection to allow appropriate monitoring. Guidelines detailing original contraindications for thrombolytic drugs suggest avoidance of these drugs for 10 days following puncture of non-compressible vessels. (Strong, High evidence)

8.2  In patients who have received fibrinolytic and thrombolytic drugs, we recommend against needle placement for at least 48 hours. Documentation of normalization of clotting studies (including fibrinogen) is suggested. (Strong, High evidence)

* Strong recommendation in the current ASRA PM (5th edition) wording [1] emphasizes the high hemorrhagic risk in these patients, especially when combined with other anticoagulants. Patients receiving fibrinolytic/ thrombolytic medications are at risk of serious hemorrhagic events, particularly those who have undergone an invasive procedure. Recommendations are based on the profound effect on hemostasis, the use of concomitant heparin and/or antiplatelet agents (which further increase the risk of bleeding), and the potential for sponaneous neuraxial bleeding with these medications.

**The fibrinolytic system dissolves intravascular clots as a result of the action of plasmin which is a non-specific protease capable of dissolving fibrin clots and other plasma proteins, including several coagulation factors. Exogenous plasminogen activators, such as streptokinase and urokinase, dissolve thrombus and affect circulating plasminogen as well. Pharmacological t-PA formulations (Alteplase, Tenecteplase) are more fibrin-selective and have less effect on circulating plasminogen. Clot lysis leads to elevation of fibrin degradation products, which themselves have an anticoagulant antithrombotic effect by inhibiting platelet aggregation. Given the nature of the underlying thrombotic medical conditions being treated, patients who receive fibrinolytic therapy frequently receive intravenous heparin to maintain an aPTT of 1.5–2 times normal. Often an antiplatelet agent such as aspirin or clopidogrel is also added. While the plasma half-life of thrombolytic drugs is only hours, it may take days for the thrombolytic effect to resolve. Fibrinogen and plasminogen are maximally depressed at 5 hours after thrombolytic therapy and remain significantly depressed at 27 hours [75]. Importantly, original contraindications to thrombolytic therapy included surgery or puncture of non-compressible vessels within 10 days [76].

8.3  In those patients who have received neuraxial blocks at or near the time of fibrinolytic and thrombolytic therapy, we recommend that frequent neurological monitoring (eg, every 2 hours) should be continued for at least 48 hours after the last dose. If neuraxial blocks have been combined with fibrinolytic and thrombolytic therapy and ongoing epidural catheter infusion, we recommend the infusion should be limited to drugs minimizing sensory and motor block to facilitate assessment of neurological function. (Strong, Low evidene)

* Because the potential harm is severe and early monitoring is low risk, ASRA PM (5th edition)  in the current guidelines [1] issued a strong recommendation despite low-quality evidence ( primarily case reports, case series, and expert consensus). There are no RTCs; recommendations are based on the known catastrophic risk of spinal/epidural hematoma and pharmacologic effects of thrombolytics.

**There are no large series addressing regional anesthesia in the patient receiving fibrinolytic/thrombolytic therapy. The majority of published reports involve spontaneous spinal or epidural hematomas after thrombolytic therapy [37, 77-79]. Recent cases involve thrombolysis for myocardial infarction and bleeding has been reported at all spinal levels - cervical, thoracic, and lumbar [80,81].

9.    Vitamin K antagonists (Warfarin)

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in the patient on Warfarin

9.1  We recommend that the anticoagulant therapy be stopped 5 days prior to the planned procedure, and the INR be measured and normalized (normal range of the local laboratory) prior to needle placement. (Strong, Moderate evidence)

Warfarin exerts its anticoagulant effect by interfering with the synthesis of the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors VII, IX, X, and II (thrombin). The effects of warfarin are dependent on clotting factor half-lives and the anticoagulant effect is not apparent until there is a significant amount of biologically inactive clotting factors [82]. 

* ASRA PM (5th edition)  in the current guidelines are consistent with ESAIC/ESRA guidelines [5] that warfarin should be discontinued for at least 5 days and the INR should be measured and normalized (per local laboratory) prior to performance of a neuraxial block. **Recommendations are based on warfarin pharmacology, the clinical relevance of vitamin K coagulation factor levels/deficiencies, long clinical experience, observational safety data case series, and case reports of spinal hematoma among these patients. Websites are available to assist clinicians with warfarin dosing [83].

9.2  In patients receiving an initial dose of warfarin prior to surgery, we suggest the INR should be checked prior to needle placement if the first dose was given >24 hours earlier, or if a second dose of oral anticoagulant has been administered. (Conditional, Low evidence)

9.3  In patients receiving low-dose warfarin therapy during epidural analgesia, we suggest that their INR be monitored daily. (Conditional, Low evidence)

9.4  We suggest that neuraxial catheters be removed when the INR is <1.5. (Conditional, Low evidence)

9.5  In patients with INR >1.5 but <3, the increased risk of maintaining a neuraxial catheter remains unknown. We suggest indwelling catheters may be maintained or removed with caution, closely following the INR and duration of warfarin therapy. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*ASRA PM (5th edition)  in the current guidelines are consistent with ESAIC/ESRA guidelines [5] that neuraxial injections and removal of epidural catheters appear to be safe when done within 24 hours after warfarin is initiated. This was documented by Parvizi et al [84]. who noted the absence of spinal hematoma in over 12 000 patients in whom they removed the epidural catheters within 24–48 hours of initiation of warfarin therapy. The safety of removing epidural catheters was also documented by other investigators [85, 86]. No spinal hematoma occurred after removal of catheters 12–14 hours after warfarin therapy, even in the patients with INRs of 1.5–1.9. The mean (±SD) factor VII levels 12 hours after warfarin initiation were noted to be normal in the patients with INRs ≤1.4 and acceptable in the patients with INRs of 1.5–1.9 [87]. Another group of investigators showed no spinal hematoma in 4365 patients when epidural catheters were removed while on warfarin; the mean duration of warfarin treatment was 2.1±0.6 days and the INRs at the time of removal was 1.9±0.4 (range 1.5–7.1) [86].

9.6  In patients with an INR >3, we recommend that the warfarin dose be held or reduced in patients with indwelling neuraxial catheters. (Strong, Low evidence)

9.7  Neurological testing of sensory and motor function should be performed routinely during epidural analgesia for patients on warfarin therapy. To facilitate neurological evaluation, we recommend that the type of analgesic solution be tailored to minimize the degree of sensory and motor blockade. (Strong, Low evidence)

9.8  We suggest that neurological assessment be continued for at least 48 hours following catheter removal. (Conditional, Low evidence)

* ASRA PM (5th edition)  guidelines are consistent with the ESAIC/ESRA guidelines [5]. This recommendation is strong despite low evidence due to the high consensus among experts as spinal/epidural hematoma is rare but catastrophic and early neurological detection is critical for outcome.

When there is an elevated INR without major bleeding, the warfarin can be reversed with oral vitamin K. Intravenous vitamin K can be administered when there is active bleeding [82]. When there is life-threatening bleeding, recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa), three-factor PCC which contain factors II, IX, and X, or four-factor PCC, containing factors II, VII, IX, and X, can be given. Activated rFVIIa and PCCs are better than FFP in reversing warfarin [88].

10.  Herbal medications

Management of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block in patients using Herbal therapy

10.1The use of herbal medications does not create a level of risk that will interfere with the performance of neuraxial blocks. We recommend against the mandatory discontinuation of these medications or avoidance of regional anesthetic techniques in patients on these medications (Strong, Low evidence)

*According to recommendations of ASRA PM [1] herbal medications alone do not significantly increase spinal hematoma risk and Routine discontinuation is not recommended. Caution only when combined with anticoagulants or in patients with bleeding disorders. Morbidity and mortality associated with herbal use may be more likely in the perioperative period because of the polypharmacy and physiological alterations that occur. Such complications include bleeding from garlic, ginkgo, and ginseng, and potential interaction between ginseng-warfarin (Appendix, Table 4).

**Despite the widespread use of herbal medications, there are few controlled clinical trials of the efficacy (or adverse effects) and few outcome studies of the effects of herbal medications on surgical patients; a prospective study including over 600 patients found no differences in surgical outcomes, including bleeding, in patients reporting recent herbal therapy [89]. However, while overall there does not appear to be a clinically significant increase in surgical bleeding or spinal hematoma in patients receiving herbal medications, data on the combination of herbal therapy with other forms of anticoagulation are lacking. The concurrent use of other medications affecting clotting mechanisms, such as oral anticoagulants or heparin, may increase the risk of bleeding complications in these patients. Thus, it is often recommended that these medications be discontinued in anticipation of surgery, but there is no reason for cancellation of the procedure if patients have not done so [90].

11. Antithrombotic therapy in pregnancy

Management of neuraxial block in the anticoagulated parturient

11.1Given the limited pharmacological data on antithrombotic agents in pregnancy and in the absence of a large series of neuraxial techniques in the pregnant population receiving prophylaxis or treatment for venous thromboembolism, we suggest that the recommendations included in this document be applied to parturients (Conditional, Low evidence (

11.2 However, in circumstances involving select high-risk parturients receiving VTE prophylaxis, and requiring urgent interventions for maternal or fetal indications, the risk of general anesthesia may be greater than neuraxial anesthesia, and exceptions/ modifications of these recommendations may be appropriate. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*The primary guideline source is ASRA PM (fifth edition) [1], based largely on pharmacologic principles, limited obstetric-specific neuraxial safety data, Reliance on extrapolation from nonpregnant populations due to lack of robust pregnancy-specific data.

The incidence of neuraxial hematoma after spinal or epidural blockade in the obstetric population is difficult to determine, although it is widely reported that these patients have a significantly lower incidence of this complication than older populations [33].  Bateman et al [91] confirmed the substantially lower risk of neuraxial hematoma in obstetric patients documenting seven epidural hematomas among 142 287 patients undergoing epidural anesthesia/analgesia (1:20 326). These findings are particularly notable since bloody taps, a reputed risk factor for neuraxial hematoma, are more common in the obstetric than in the general surgical population [92].

** A systematic review of English language publications (1952–2016) revealed no cases of neuraxial hematoma due to neuraxial anesthesia and low dose (thromboprophylaxis) in obstetric patients, although the denominator (total number of cases) was unknown [93].  A subsequent publication reported the development of a neuraxial hematoma after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery when a larger dose of LMWH was administered post partum, earlier than the time interval recommended by ASRA guidelines [94]. Potential explanations for the lower incidence of neuraxial hematoma in obstetric compared with older, orthopedic patients include the hypercoagulable state and a more compliant epidural space, unimpeded by osteoporotic deformities, which can accommodate larger volumes of blood before symptomatic neural compression occurs [33,95].

The peripartum management of the obstetric patient that receives anticoagulant medications presents a significant clinical challenge [96,97]. ACOG and the SOAP recommendations support every labor unit having a protocol for when anticoagulants should be stopped, and if short-term strategies such as converting to UFH, due to its shorter half-life, in anticipation of delivery should be considered [97]. In the event of unforeseen labor or urgent cesarean delivery, the choice of analgesia and/or anesthesia should balance the risks of general anesthesia and benefits of neuraxial anesthesia given the anticoagulant, dose, time of administration, and pertinent laboratory values. The plan for reinitiating anticoagulation post partum must also incorporate the anesthetic management and hemostasis after delivery.

12.  Plexus and peripheral blockade in the anticoagulated patient

Management of deep plexus/peripheral block in the anticoagulated patient

12.1  For patients undergoing deep plexus or deep peripheral block, we recommend that guidelines for neuraxial block be similarly applied. (Strong, Low evidence)

12.2  For patients undergoing other plexus or peripheral techniques, we suggest performance, catheter maintenance, and catheter removal be based on site compressibility, vascularity, and consequences of bleeding, should it occur. (Conditional, Low evidence)

*As per ASRA PM [1] evidence-based guidelines are based primarily on case reports and case series of bleeding complications, pharmacologic reasoning regarding noncompressible vascular spaces and expert consensus. Deep plexus blocks (e.g., lumbar plexus, paravertebral) occur in noncompressible spaces, similar to neuraxial techniques. Bleeding in these locations can be occult and delayed and cause major neurologic injury. Unlike neuraxial and deep plexus blocks, most peripheral nerve blocks occur in compressible locations, so risk varies widely by site. ASRA therefore recommends individual risk assessment based on three key factors: site compressibility, vascularity of the region and consequences of bleeding e.g., potential for nerve compression.

Unfortunately, there continues to be a lack of investigations examining the frequency and severity of hemorrhagic complications following plexus or peripheral blockade in anticoagulated patients. In addition, there continues to be case reports of significant morbidity related to hematomas following peripheral nerve blockade in coagulopathic patients [98,99].

In the practice advisory published by the Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists Society sought to stratify the bleeding risk into ‘low risk,’ ‘intermediate risk,’ or ‘high risk’ for peripheral nerve blocks and interfascial plane blocks [100]. Hemorrhagic complications following the deep plexus/deep peripheral techniques (including but not limited to those listed as high risk, eg, stellate ganglion, infraclavicular, lumbar sympathetic, lumbar plexus, and paravertebral), particularly in the presence of antithrombotic therapy, are often serious and a source of major patient morbidity [100].  These cases continue to suggest that significant blood loss, rather than neural deficits, may be the most serious complication.

- Acknowledgements

The Guidelines for Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy - Edition 2026 - were prepared by the Guidelines Development Group (GDG) of the Egyptian Board of Anesthetics, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management group which reserves the right to determine the publication and distribution of the Guidelines. The Guidelines are subject to revision, and the updated versions will be published when needed, as warranted by the evolution of new-evidenced medical knowledge, new technology, and new practice trends. Although the Egyptian Board of Anesthetics, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management  encourages Egyptian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, we cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient’s circumstances. Egyptian Board of Anesthetics, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management  assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy

These Guidelines are intended to apply to all anesthesiologists in Egypt. The independent practice of anesthesia is a specialized field of medicine, which should be practiced by physicians with appropriate training who continue their education in the practice of anesthetics, surgical intensive care, pain management, perioperative care, and resuscitation.

All physicians applying for privileges in anesthesia should show satisfactory completion of specialist postgraduate training in anesthesiology certified by either the Egyptian Board training or the standard training in University programs to be able to provide these services. International medical graduates approved for licensure by provincial regulatory bodies should show training equivalent to the Egyptian standard. The only route to specialist recognition in anesthesiology in Egypt is through the “certification process” of “Egyptian Health Council” (EHC).

We would like to acknowledge the Anesthesia Guidelines Development Group (GDG) of the Egyptian Board of Anesthetics, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management.

Development Committee for adapting these guidelines

Chair of the GDG: Prof. Sanaa Abd El-Kareem Helmy, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University.

Rapporteur of the GDG: Prof. Salah El-Sherif, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University.

Members of the GDG:

-        Prof. Hassan Mohamed, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University.

-        Prof. Hala El-Gendy, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University.

-        Prof. Ghada Ali, Faculty of Medicine, Menofia University.

-        Prof. Khaled Maghawry, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University.

- Abbreviations

AAPM: American Academy of Pain Medicine

ACCP: American College of Clinical Pharmacy

ACOG: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

ADP: Adenosine diphosphate

AF: Atrial Fibrillation

AGREE II: Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II

aPCC: activated prothrombin complex concentrates

aPTT: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists.

ASRA: American Society of Regional Anesthesia

ASRA PM: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

aXa: anti-X activity

BID: twice daily

BMI: body mass index

CAD: Coronary artery disease

CrCI: Creatinine clearance

CT: Computed Tomography

CYP3A4: Cytochrome P450 3A4

CV: Cardiovascular

DOACs: Direct oral anticoagulants

DTI: direct thrombin inhibitor

DVT: Deep venous thrombosis

DXA: direct Xa antagonists

ECG: Electrocardiography

EHC: Egyptian Health Council

EHRA: European Heart Rhythm Association

ESA: European Society of Anaesthesiology

ESAIC: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.

ESRA: European Society of Regional Anaesthesia

FDA: Food and Drug Administration

FFP: Fresh Frozen Plasma

GDG: Guidelines Development Group

GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

GPS: Good Practice Statement.

GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation

HIT: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

ICU: intensive care unit

IMPROVE: International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism

INR: international normalized ratio

IV: Intravenous

LA: Local Anesthetic

LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin

MI: Myocardial infarction

MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

N/A: Not available

NIBP: Non-invasive Blood Pressure

NSAID: Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug

NYSORA: New York School of Regional Anesthesia

NVAF: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation

PAD: Peripheral artery disease

PADUA: from University of Padua, Padova Italy

PAUSE: Perioperative Anticoagulation Use for Surgery Evaluation

P2Y12 inhibitors: P2Y12 receptor antagonists or blockers (A class of antiplatelet medications)

PCC: prothrombin complex concentrates

PDE: phosphodiesterase

PE: Pulmonary embolism

P-gp: P-glycoprotein

PT: Prothrombin Time

RCT: Randomized Controlled Trials

rFVIIa: recombinant activated factor VIIa

SC: Sub-cutaneous

SOAP: Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology.

THA: Total hip arthroplasty

TIA: Transient ischemic attack

TID: three times daily

tPA: Tissue-type plasminogen activator

UFH: Unfractionated Heparin

UK: United kingdom

USA: United States of America

VKA: Vitamin K Antagonist

VTE: Venous thromboembolism

WHO: World Health Organization

- Glossary

Basic Principles and Terminology

The following definitions are used For the purposes of these guidelines:

➡️Anesthesiologist: the term anesthesiologist in this document is used to designate all licensed medical practitioners with privileges to administer anesthetics, surgical intensive care, pain management, perioperative care, and resuscitation. 

➡️Antithrombotic therapy: a medical approach using medications to prevent or treat blood clots (thrombosis) in arteries and veins, reducing risks of stroke, heart attack, and venous thromboembolism.

➡️Autonomic Dysfunction: New-onset urinary retention or fecal incontinence.

➡️Back Pain: Severe, localized back pain, often described as "stabbing" or radiating to the legs.

➡️Hematoma: is a collection of blood that pools outside of blood vessels, usually caused by injury or trauma to veins or arteries. 

➡️Motor Deficit: New or progressive extremity weakness (unable to perform a straight leg raise).

➡️Neuraxial anesthesia: is a regional anesthetic technique involving the injection of medication (local anesthetics, often with opioids) into the cerebrospinal fluid or epidural space to block nerve conduction at the spinal cord/nerve root levels.

➡️Regional anesthesia: a pain management technique that uses injections of local anesthetics to block nerves, numbing a specific, large area of the body (e.g., limbs, abdomen, or lower body) while the patient remains conscious or sedated.

➡️Sensory Deficit: New or worsening numbness or "heaviness" in a dermatomal distribution.

➡️Thrombolytic therapy: an emergency medical procedure that uses special medication, known as "clot-busters" (e.g., tissue plasminogen activator or tPA), to dissolve dangerous, deep-seated blood clots.

➡️t-PA formulations: Tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) formulations include recombinant, FDA-approved thrombolytic agents (alteplase, reteplase, tenecteplase) for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism.

➡️Traumatic Tap: is defined as the aspiration or spontaneous appearance of blood in the needle or catheter during the performance of a regional anesthetic technique.

- Introduction

Hemorrhagic complications may occur after any neuraxial (spinal or epidural) or peripheral/plexus regional anesthetic technique. However, when the bleeding occurs within fixed, non-compressible, and/or concealed sites, such as the spinal canal or psoas compartment, the result may be catastrophic. The development and evolving status of standards for the prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), as well as the introduction of increasingly more potent antithrombotic medications, resulted in concerns regarding the heightened risk of neuraxial bleeding after neuraxial and deep plexus or deep peripheral blocks. In response to these ongoing patient safety issues, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA PM) has published the fifth edition on 2025 [1] after four previous sets of evidence-based recommendations for the management of regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy.

The previous European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) guidelines on ‘regional anesthesia and antithrombotic agents’ were published in 2010 [2]. In the same year, ASRA also published its third edition of similar guidelines [3]. The fourth edition of the ASRA guidelines in 2018 were the result of a collaboration with ESA to construct a single set of guidelines [4]. As a result, the differences were only minimal. The most recent European guidelines were a collaborative effort of both the ESAIC and the ESRA and were published in February 2022 [5].

An understanding of the complexity of this issue is essential to patient management and these guidelines cannot be applied universally to the complex scenarios that may confront clinicians. Rather, the decision to perform spinal, epidural, or deep plexus/peripheral anesthesia/analgesia, as well as the timing of catheter removal in a patient receiving antithrombotic therapy, should be made on an individual basis.

The following recommendations are aimed at providing basic guidelines to anesthetic practice for Anesthesia for Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy. They are intended as a framework for reasonable and acceptable patient care and should be interpreted as such to allow for some degree of flexibility in different circumstances.

- Purpose and Scope

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist anesthesiologists to enhance the quality of their anesthetic practice based on evidence for care of Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy, leading to improve patient safety, improve in health indicators such as mortality and incidence and severity of regional anesthesia-related complications and to increase patient satisfaction.

These guidelines focus on the anesthetic management of Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy

The intended patient population includes all patients receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy undergoing neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block.

- Target Audience

These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals working as Anesthesiologists. They also may serve as a resource for healthcare professionals such as anesthesia Nurses, perioperative care teams, policy makers, hospital managers, and other stakeholders who advise or care for patients who will receive regional anesthesia care .

All physicians applying for privileges in anesthesia should show satisfactory completion of specialist postgraduate training in anesthesiology, standard training in the Egyptian Board program, University programs or equivalent.

- METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search for guidelines was done to identify the most relevant ones to consider for adaptation. For the literature review, potentially relevant clinical studies were identified via electronic and manual searches of the literature. The updated searches covered a 10-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2025. The inclusion/exclusion criteria that were followed in the search and retrieval of guidelines are adapted.

We selected guidelines only if they are:

- Evidence-based guidelines.

-  National and/or international guidelines.

-  Guidelines published from 2015 to 2025.

-  Peer reviewed publications.

-  Guidelines written in English language.

We Excluded guidelines that are:

-  Written by a single author not on behalf of an organization as guideline to be valid and comprehensive, ideally requires multidisciplinary input.

§  Published without references as the panel needs to know whether a thorough literature review was conducted and whether the current evidence was used in the preparation of the recommendations.

All retrieved Guidelines were screened and appraised using AGREE II instrument (www.agreetrust.org) by at least three members of the GDG. The panel decided on a cut-off point or ranked the guidelines (any guideline scoring above 50% on the rigor dimension was retained).

Guidelines used in the Adaptation Process:

The basic elements of the international guidelines for the management of regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy published by international societies can be successfully implemented in the practice of regional anesthesia worldwide. The Guidelines Development Group (GDG) for the Egyptian Board of Anesthetics, Surgical Intensive Care, and Pain Management has adopted with modification:

1.     Kopp SL, Vandermeulen E, McBane RD, Perlas A, Leffert L, Horlocker T. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Evidence-Based Guidelines (fifth edition). Regional Anesthesia & Pain medicine. 2025 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-5445 (Reference No. 1)

2.     Horlocker TT , Vandermeuelen E , Kopp SL , et al. Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:263–309. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000763 (Reference No. 4)

3.     Kietaibl S , Ferrandis R , Godier A , et al . Regional anaesthesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs: Joint ESAIC/ESRA guidelines. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022;39:100-32. 

doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001600 (Reference No. 5)

4.     Narouze S, Benzon HT, Provenzano D , et al. Interventional Spine and Pain Procedures in Patients on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medications (Second Edition): Guidelines From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43(3):225-262. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000700 (Reference No. 6)

5.     Benzon HT, Nelson AM, Patel AG , et al. Literature review of spinal hematoma case reports: causes and outcomes in pediatric, obstetric, neuraxial and pain medicine cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024. doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-105161 (Reference No. 7)

6.     Douxfils J , Ageno W , Samama C-M , et al. Laboratory testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for clinicians. J Thromb Haemost 2018;16:209–19. doi:10.1111/jth.13912 (Reference No. 17)

7.     Douketis JD , Spyropoulos AC , Murad MH , et al. Executive Summary: Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest 2022;162:1127–39. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.004 (Reference No. 58)

8.     Leffert LR, Dubois HM, Butwick AJ , et al. Neuraxial Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients Receiving Thromboprophylaxis With Unfractionated or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: A Systematic Review of Spinal Epidural Hematoma. Anesth Analg 2017;125:223–31. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002173 (Reference No. 93)

9.     Tsui BCH, Kirkham K, Kwofie MK , et al. Practice advisory on the bleeding risks for peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blockade: evidence review and expert consensus. Can J Anaesth 2019;66:1356–84. doi:10.1007/s12630-019-01466-w (Reference No. 100)

➡️Strength of Recommendations

The strength of a recommendation communicates the importance of adherence to the recommendation.

- Evidence

➡️Evidence Assessment

According to WHO Handbook for Guidelines, we used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the quality of a body of evidence, develop and report recommendations. GRADE methods are used by WHO because these represent internationally agreed standards for making transparent recommendations.

➡️WHO Copyright page

Unrestricted materials of the standard disclaimers for WHO publications are used.

Detailed GRADE information is available on the following sites:

•   GRADE working group: https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/

•   GRADE online training modules: http://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/

Quality Definition Implications

Evidence is categorized as High, Moderate, Low and Very low.

Table 1: Quality and Significance of the Four Levels of Evidence in GRADE:

- Implementation Considerations

Before starting the placement of the neuraxial intervention or deep plexus/peripheral block, do the following for the safe performance of the procedure:

·     Check the regional block equipment before starting.

·     Check the anesthetic machine first thing in morning.

·     Check the airway management equipment.

·     An Anesthetic assistant should be available.

·     Emergency drugs must be instantly available.

·     Monitoring equipment should be available (ECG, NIBP, Pulse oximeter) prior to start.

·     WHO Checklist must be done.

Postoperative Monitoring & Clinical Red Flags:

Patients who have experienced a traumatic tap require enhanced neurological monitoring for at least 24 hours following the procedure or until the first dose of anticoagulation has been safely tolerated.

The 2-hour Audit:  When indicated with neuroxial block, perform a focused neurological exam every 2 hours, assessing for:

·        Motor Deficit: New or progressive lower extremity weakness (unable to perform a straight leg raise).

·        Sensory Deficit: New or worsening numbness or "heaviness" in a dermatomal distribution.

·        Back Pain: Severe, localized back pain, often described as "stabbing" or radiating to the legs.

·        Autonomic Dysfunction: New-onset urinary retention or fecal incontinence.

Emergency Response: If any of the above "Red Flags" are identified:

• STAT MRI: Immediate neuroimaging (MRI is the gold standard; CT Myelogram is second line).
• Neurosurgical Consult: Immediate notification of the spine or neurosurgical team for potential emergency decompression.
• Reverse Anticoagulation: If the patient has received an anticoagulant dose, initiate reversal protocols; e.g. Protamine for Heparin, Idarucizumab for Dabigatran, or prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) for Factor Xa inhibitors.

- Research Gaps

Literature review shows insufficient research data that need further studies for:

-    The pharmacologic reversal of the Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) effect by using their antidotes to facilitate placement of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block.

-  The safety of indwelling neuraxial catheters in patients receiving postoperative high-dose UFH has not been established. Definition of the safest interval needs to be defined.

-   No well-established reversal strategy in patients receiving parenteral thrombin inhibitors. Research is needed for Antidotes to the antithrombin effect, so it can be reversed pharmacologically.

-  Lack of specific reversal agent in the patient receiving fondaparinux for safe anagement of neuraxial block or deep plexus/peripheral block.

-    Inspite of the widespread use of herbal medications, there are few controlled clinical trials of the efficacy/adverse effects and few outcome studies of the effects of herbal medications on surgical patients. Data on combination of herbal therapy with other forms of anticoagulation are lacking.

-  Lack of investigations examining the frequency and severity of hemorrhagic complications following plexus or peripheral blockade in anticoagulated patients.

- Clinical Indicators for Monitoring

-        Percentage of cases of neuraxial hematoma reported due to neuraxial anesthesia in patients treated with the initial recommended dose-ranging:

Numerator: Number of cases of neuraxial hematoma reported

      Denominator: denominator: total number of the studied cases)

-        Incidence of spinal hematoma reported in patients undergoing continuous neuraxial or deep peripheral block:

      Numerator: Number of cases of spinal hematoma reported

      Denominator: total number of patients undergoing continuous neuraxial or deep peripheral block

-        Incidence of spinal hematoma reported at the time of neuraxial catheter removal:

             Numerator: Number of cases of spinal hematoma reported at time of catheter removal

             Denominator: total number of patients undergoing continuous neuraxial block

-        Relation of the time of catheter removal to the incidence of spinal hematoma.

- Update of the Guideline

The Guidelines of this current version (Year 2026) are subject to revision, and the updated versions will be published when needed, as warranted by the evolution of new-evidenced medical knowledge, new technology, and new practice trends.

- Guidelines Development Contributors and Participants

Contributors and Participants:

The Guidelines Development Group (GDG) of the Egyptian Board of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, and Pain Management.

- Annexes

Annex I: Evidence-to-Decision Tables

1.     Transition to "Low/High Dose" Terminology and Conservative Timing

Recommendation: Replace "prophylactic/therapeutic" dosing with "low/high dose" and maintain a conservative "antihemorrhagic" approach for wait times.

2.     Classification of Deep Plexus and Peripheral Blocks as "High Risk."

Recommendation: Apply the same stringent timing guidelines for neuraxial blocks to deep, non-compressible, or concealed peripheral blocks.

3.     Evidence-to-Decision Summary for Dosing and Timing

4.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of DOACs

5.    Evidence-to-Decision Table of UFH

6.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of LMWH  

7.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of Antiplatelets

8.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of Thrombolytics

9.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of Warfarin

Annex II: Timing Tables

1.     Timing Table of LMWH:

2.    Specific Drug Timing (Wait Times Before Block)

Annex III:

Traumatic (Bloody) Tap Management Protocol

- Definition and Identification: A Traumatic Tap is defined as the aspiration or spontaneous appearance of blood in the needle or catheter during the performance of a regional anesthetic technique. In the context of "high-risk" blocks, this indicates potential vessel injury in a non-compressible or concealed space (e.g., the epidural space or psoas compartment).

- Immediate Procedural Management:

• Aspiration Check: If blood is seen, the needle should be repositioned or the procedure aborted, depending on the clinical urgency and the degree of difficulty.
• Documentation: The occurrence of a traumatic tap must be clearly documented in the anesthetic record and the patient's medical chart to alert the postoperative care team.
• Surgical Communication: Inform the surgical team of the event, as it may influence the choice and timing of postoperative thromboprophylaxis.
• Medication Management (Restart Delays): To ensure the stability of the initial platelet plug and prevent the expansion of an occult hematoma, the administration of the first postoperative dose of anticoagulation must be delayed.

*Note: While specific manufacturer recommendations are currently lacking for Dabigatran and Edoxaban, the ASRA 2025 "antihemorrhagic" philosophy suggests a conservative delay of at least 24 hours (or 48 hours if high-dose therapy is planned).

Appendix:

Table 1: Suggested risk stratification for patient-specific periprocedural thromboembolism*

 *Empiric risk stratification that is a starting point for assessing perioperative thromboembolism risk; should be combined with clinical judgment that incorporates individual patient-related and surgery/procedure-related factors.

†Includes: AF, prior stroke/TIA during anticoagulant interruption or other prior stroke/TIA, prior valve thrombosis, rheumatic heart disease [101].

Table 2: VTE risk scoring tools: medical patients.

BMI, body mass index; ICU, intensive care unit; IMPROVE, International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism; MI, myocardial infarction; PADUA, University of Padua, Padova Italy; VTE, venous thromboembolism [1].

Table 3: Direct Oral Anticoagulants

CAD, coronary artery disease; CrCI, creatinine clearance; CV, cardiovascular; CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 3A4; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; N/A, not available; NVAF, non-valvular atrial fibrillation; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PE, pulmonary embolism; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TIA, transient ischemic attack; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Table 4: Three Herbal Medications with the greatest impact on hemostasis*

Adapted from Horlocker et al. [3]

*At this time, it is not deemed necessary to discontinue herbal medications and allow resolution of their effects on hemostasis prior to surgery or anesthesia.

- REFERENCES

1.       Kopp SL, Vandermeulen E, McBane RD, Perlas A, Leffert L, Horlocker T. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Evidence-Based Guidelines (fifth edition). Regional Anesthesia & Pain medicine. 2025 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-5445

2.       Gogarten W, Vandermeulen E, Van Aken H , et al. Regional anaesthesia and antithrombotic agents: recommendations of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:999–1015. doi:10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833f6f6f

3.       Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC , et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:64–101. doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e3181c15c70

4.       Horlocker TT, Vandermeuelen E, Kopp SL , et al. Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Fourth Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:263–309. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000763

5.       Kietaibl S, Ferrandis R, Godier A , et al. Regional anaesthesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs: Joint ESAIC/ESRA guidelines. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022;39:100–32. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001600

6.       Narouze S, Benzon HT, Provenzano D, et al. (ASRA/ESRA consensus). Interventional Spine and Pain Procedures in Patients on Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medications (Second Edition). Guidelines From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) and Pain Medicine, the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia (ESRA) and Pain Therapy, the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), the International Neuromodulation Society, the North American Neuromodulation Society, and the World Institute of Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(3):225-262.

7.       Benzon HT, Nelson AM, Patel AG , et al. Literature review of spinal hematoma case reports: causes and outcomes in pediatric, obstetric, neuraxial and pain medicine cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024. doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-105161

8.       Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF , et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:381S–453S. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0656

9.       Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V , et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:2450–7. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04044.x 

10.    Spyropoulos AC, Anderson FA, FitzGerald G , et al. Predictive and associative models to identify hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE. Chest 2011;140:706–14. doi:10.1378/chest.10-1944 

11.    Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK , et al. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg 2010;251:344–50. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b7fca6 

12.    Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Duncan J , et al . Perioperative Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant. JAMA Intern Med 2019;179:1469–78. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2431

13.    Steffel J, Collins R, Antz M , et al. 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Europace 2021;23:1612–76. doi:10.1093/europace/euab065

14.    Afshari A, Ageno W, Ahmed A , et al. European Guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Executive summary. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018;35:77–83. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000729 

15.    Samama CM, Afshari A, Force EVGT. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018;35:73–6. doi:10.1097/EJA.000000000000070

16.    Rosencher N, Bonnet MP, Sessler DI. Selected new antithrombotic agents and neuraxial anaesthesia for major orthopaedic surgery: management strategies. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1154–60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05195.x 

17.    Douxfils J, Ageno W, Samama C-M , et al. Laboratory testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for clinicians. J Thromb Haemost 2018;16:209–19. doi:10.1111/jth.13912

18.    Godier A, Dincq A-S, Martin A-C , et al. Predictors of pre-procedural concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants: a prospective multicentre study. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2431–9. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx403 

19.    Dunois C. Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). Biomedicines 2021;9:445. doi:10.3390/biomedicines9050445

20.    Boissier E, Senage T, Babuty A , et al. Heparin Anti-Xa Activity, a Readily Available Unique Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Fondaparinux, and Danaparoid Levels. Anesth Analg 2021;132:707–16. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005114 

21.    Faraoni D, Levy JH, Albaladejo P , et al. Updates in the perioperative and emergency management of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Crit Care 2015;19:203. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0930-9 

22.    Douketis JD, Syed S, Schulman S. Periprocedural Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Comment on the 2015 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Guidelines. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:127–9. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000360 

23.    Andexxa: full prescribing information. Available: https://www.andexxa.com/prescribing-information.html [Accessed 18 Aug 2022].

24.    Lu G, DeGuzman FR, Hollenbach SJ , et al. A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa. Nat Med 2013;19:446–51. doi:10.1038/nm.3102

25.    Praxbind full prescribing information. 2015. Available: http://docs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Praxbind/Praxbind.pdf [Accessed 18 Aug 2022].

26.    Zada I, Wang S, Akerman M , et al. Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for the Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants. J Intensive Care Med 2021;36:58–62. doi:10.1177/0885066619882909 

27.    Stafford-Smith M. Impaired haemostasis and regional anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1996;43:R129–41. doi:10.1007/BF03011675 

28.    Vandermeulen E, Singelyn F, Vercauteren M , et al. Belgian guidelines concerning central neural blockade in patients with drug-induced alteration of coagulation: an update. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2005;56:139–46.

29.    Vandiver JW, Vondracek TG. Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. Pharmacotherapy 2012;32:546–58. doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01049.x 

30.    Cuker A, Arepally GM, Chong BH , et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv 2018;2:3360–92. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024489 

31.    Lubenow N, Kempf R, Eichner A , et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: temporal pattern of thrombocytopenia in relation to initial use or reexposure to heparin. Chest 2002;122:37–42. doi:10.1378/chest.122.1.37 

32.    Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI , et al. Parenteral anticoagulants: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141:e24S–e43S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2291 

33.    Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L. Severe Neurological Complications after Central Neuraxial Blockades in Sweden 19901999. Anesthesiology 2004;101:950–9.doi:10.1097/00000542-200410000-00021

34.    Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Vermylen J. Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1994;79:1165–77. doi:10.1213/00000539-199412000-00024 

35.    Fox KAA, Mehta SR, Peters R , et al. Benefits and Risks of the Combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revascularization for Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circulation 2004;110:1202–8. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000140675.85342.1B

36.    Rao TLK, El-Etr AA. Anticoagulation Following Placement of Epidural and Subarachnoid Catheters. Anesthesiology 1981;55:618–20. doi:10.1097/00000542-198155060-00002 

37.    Wulf H. Epidural anaesthesia and spinal haematoma. Can J Anaesth 1996;43:1260–71. doi:10.1007/BF03013437

38.     Rosen DA, Hawkinberry DW, Rosen KR , et al. An Epidural Hematoma in an Adolescent Patient After Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesia Analgesia 2004;98:966–9. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000103267.37895.5B 

39.    Ho AM, Chung DC, Joynt GM. Neuraxial blockade and hematoma in cardiac surgery: estimating the risk of a rare adverse event that has not (yet) occurred. Chest 2000;117:551–5. doi:10.1378/chest.117.2.551

40.    Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C , et al. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:257S–298S. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0674

41.    Pace M, Koury K, Gulur P. Epidurals in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin three times a day: the value of activated partial thromboplastin time testing. Anesth Analg 2014;119:1215–8. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000437

42.    Davis JJ, Bankhead BR, Eckman EJ , et al. Three-times-daily subcutaneous unfractionated heparin and neuraxial anesthesia: a retrospective review of 928 cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:623–6. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31826a8d10 

43.    Su J, Soliz JM, Popat KU , et al. Epidural Analgesia and Subcutaneous Heparin 3 Times Daily in Cancer Patients With Acute Postoperative Pain. Anesth Analg 2018;127:e57–9. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000003603  

44.    VanderWielen B, Rubenstein L, Shnider M , et al. Recognition of a Thoracic Epidural Hematoma in the Setting of Transient Paralysis. A A Case Rep 2017;8:294–6. doi:10.1213/XAA.0000000000000492 

45.    Greaves JD. Serious spinal cord injury due to haematomyelia caused by spinal anaesthesia in a patient treated with low-dose heparin. Anaesthesia 1997;52:150–4. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.63-az0065.x 

46.    Cosmi B, Hirsh J. Low molecular weight heparins. Curr Opin Cardiol 1994;9:612–8. doi:10.1097/00001573-199409000-00017 

47.    Shaikh SA, Regal RE. Dosing of Enoxaparin in Renal Impairment. P T 2017;42:245–9.

48.    Henshaw DS, Turner JD, Forest DJ , et al. Residual Enoxaparin Activity, Anti-Xa Levels, and Concerns About the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Anticoagulation Guidelines. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2017;42:432–6. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000617 

49.    Henshaw DS, Edwards CJ, Dobson SW , et al. Evaluating residual anti-Xa levels following discontinuation of treatment-dose enoxaparin in patients presenting for elective surgery: a prospective observational trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024;49:94–101. doi:10.1136/rapm-2023-104571 

50.    Sharma V, Terrell L, Karlapalem C , et al. 1020: therapeutic enoxaparin in morbidly obese patients: single-center experience. Crit Care Med 2023;51:504. doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000909808.50243.3e

51.    Urmey WF, Rowlingson J. Do antiplatelet agents contribute to the development of perioperative spinal hematoma? Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998;23:146–51. doi:10.1016/S1098-7339(98)90140-7

52.    Horlocker TT, Bajwa ZH, Ashraf Z , et al. Risk assessment of hemorrhagic complications associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications in ambulatory pain clinic patients undergoing epidural steroid injection. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1691–7. doi:10.1097/00000539-200212000-00041

53.    Giberson CE, Barbosa J, Brooks ES , et al. Epidural hematomas after removal of percutaneous spinal cord stimulator trial leads: two case reports. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2014;39:73–7. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000026 

54.    Amezcua JL, O’Grady J, Salmon JA , et al. Prolonged paradoxical effect of aspirin on platelet behaviour and bleeding time in man. Thromb Res 1979;16:69–79. doi:10.1016/0049-3848(79)90270-6 

55.    Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J, Spencer FA , et al. Antiplatelet drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141:e89S–e119S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2293 

56.    Cronberg S, Wallmark E, Söderberg I. Effect on platelet aggregation of oral administration of 10 non-steroidal analgesics to humans. Scand J Haematol 1984;33:155–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.1984.tb02390.x 

57.    Leese PT, Hubbard RC, Karim A , et al. Effects of celecoxib, a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on platelet function in healthy adults: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Pharmacol 2000;40:124–32. doi:10.1177/00912700022008766 

58    Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Murad MH , et al. Executive Summary: Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest 2022;162:1127–39. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.004 

59.    Plavix prescribing information n.d. Available: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/020839s048lbl.pdf 

60.   Prasurgel. n.d. Available: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/022307s003lbl.pdf 

61.    Price MJ, Walder JS, Baker BA , et al. Recovery of Platelet Function After Discontinuation of Prasugrel or Clopidogrel Maintenance Dosing in Aspirin-Treated Patients With Stable Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:2338–43. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.042

62.    Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K , et al. Randomized Double-Blind Assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the Antiplatelet Effects of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation 2009;120:2577–85. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.912550 

63.    Hansson EC, Malm CJ, Hesse C , et al. Platelet function recovery after ticagrelor withdrawal in patients awaiting urgent coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;51:633–7. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw373 

64.    Full prescribing information. Available: http://www.azpicentral.com/brilinta/brilinta.pdf#page=1 [Accessed 15 Feb 2023].

65.    Tummala R, Rai MP. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. StatPearls, 2023.

66.    Kaneda T, Urimoto G, Suzuki T. Spinal epidural hematoma following epidural catheter removal during antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol. J Anesth 2008;22:290–3. doi:10.1007/s00540-008-0623-5 

67.    Akers WS, Oh JJ, Oestreich JH , et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a bolus and infusion of cangrelor: a direct, parenteral P2Y12 receptor antagonist. J Clin Pharmacol 2010;50:27–35. doi:10.1177/0091270009344986 

68.    Carswell JL, Beard KA, Chevrette MM , et al. Tracking trends in secondary stroke prevention strategies. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:215–9. doi:10.1345/aph.1D190 

69.    Greinacher A, Eichler P, Lubenow N , et al. Drug-induced and drug-dependent immune thrombocytopenias. Rev Clin Exp Hematol 2001;5:166–200; . doi:10.1046/j.1468-0734.2001.00041.x 

70.    Eriksson BI, Wille-Jørgensen P, Kälebo P , et al. A comparison of recombinant hirudin with a low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent thromboembolic complications after total hip replacement. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1329–35. doi:10.1056/NEJM199711063371901 

71.    Turpie AG, Gallus AS, Hoek JA , et al. A synthetic pentasaccharide for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. N Engl J Med 2001;344:619–25. doi:10.1056/NEJM200103013440901 

72.    Landow L. A synthetic pentasaccharide for the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2001;345:291–2. doi:10.1056/NEJM200107263450412 

73.    Singelyn FJ, Verheyen CCPM, Piovella F , et al. The safety and efficacy of extended thromboprophylaxis with fondaparinux after major orthopedic surgery of the lower limb with or without a neuraxial or deep peripheral nerve catheter: the EXPERT Study. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1540–7, . doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000287677.95626.60 

74.    Bauersachs RM. Fondaparinux Sodium: Recent Advances in the Management of Thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2023;28:10742484221145010. doi:10.1177/10742484221145010

75.    Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.

76.    Chan K-C, Wu D-J, Ueng K-C , et al. Spinal epidural hematoma following tissue plasminogen activator and heparinization for acute myocardial infarction. Jpn Heart J 2002;43:417–21. doi:10.1536/jhj.43.417 

77.    Ozgocmen S, Yoldas T, Kocakoc E , et al. Spinal epidural hematoma associated with streptokinase treatment for myocardial infarction. Spinal Cord 2004;42:374–7. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101604 

78.    Song KJ, Lee KB. The poor outcome of the delayed diagnosis of acute spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma: two cases report. J Korean Med Sci 2005;20:331–4. doi:10.3346/jkms.2005.20.2.331 

79.    Gupta K, Sharma R, Agrawal N , et al. Spinal epidural hematoma - A rare and debilitating complication of thrombolytic therapy. J Cardiovasc Dis Res 2013;4:236–8. doi:10.1016/j.jcdr.2014.01.005 

80.    Hirsh J, Bauer KA, Donati MB , et al. Parenteral anticoagulants: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:141S–159S. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0689 

81.    Toyonaga M, Hagiwara N, Irie F , et al. Acute cervical spinal epidural hematoma during antithrombotic therapy: dual warnings against antithrombotic therapy. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2003;43:287–90.

82.    Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E , et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:160S–198S. doi:10.1378/chest.08-0670

83.    Warfarin dosing. Available: www.WarfarinDosing.org [Accessed 1 May 2023].

84.    Parvizi J, Viscusi ER, Frank HG , et al. Can Epidural Anesthesia and Warfarin be Coadministered? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;456:133–7. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000246548.25811.2d 

85.    Benzon HT, Asher Y, Kendall MC , et al. Clotting-Factor Concentrations 5 Days After Discontinuation of Warfarin. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:616–20. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000782 

86.    Liu SS, Buvanendran A, Viscusi ER , et al. Uncomplicated removal of epidural catheters in 4365 patients with international normalized ratio greater than 1.4 during initiation of warfarin therapy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:231–5. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4376 

87.    Benzon HT, Avram MJ, Benzon HA , et al. Factor VII levels and international normalized ratios in the early phase of warfarin therapy. Anesthesiology 2010;112:298–304. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ca6cfc 

88.    Woo CH, Patel N, Conell C , et al. Rapid Warfarin reversal in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage: a comparison of plasma, recombinant activated factor VII, and prothrombin complex concentrate. World Neurosurg 2014;81:110-5. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.002 

89.    Lee A, Chui PT, Aun CST , et al. Incidence and risk of adverse perioperative events among surgical patients taking traditional Chinese herbal medicines. Anesthesiology 2006;105:454–61. doi:10.1097/00000542-200609000-00007 

90.    Moss J, Yuan CS. Herbal medicines and perioperative care. Anesthesiology 2006;105:441–2. doi:10.1097/00000542-200609000-00002 

91.    Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Ehrenfeld J, et al. The risk and outcomes of epidural  hematomas after perioperative and obstetric epidural catheterization: a report from  the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Research Consortium. Anesth Analg 2013;116:1380–5

92.    Paech MJ, Godkin R, Webster S. Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10,995 cases. Int J Obstet Anesth1998;7:5–11

93.    Leffert LR,Dubois HM, Butwick AJ, et al. Neuraxial Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients Receiving Thromboprophylaxis With Unfractionated or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: A Systematic Review of Spinal Epidural Hematoma. Anesth Analg 2017;125:223–31. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002173

94.    Pujic B, Holo- Djilvesi N, Djilvesi D, et al. Epidural hematoma following low molecular

weight heparin prophylaxis and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth 2019;37:118–21

95.    Pöpping DM, Elia N, Marret E , et al. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2008;143:990–9. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.10.990 

96.    Leffert L, Butwick A, Carvalho B , et al. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Statement on the Anesthetic Management of Pregnant and Postpartum Women Receiving Thromboprophylaxis or Higher Dose Anticoagulants. Anesth Analg 2018;126:928–44. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002530

97.    The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Inherited Thrombophilias in Pregnancy. Pract Bull 2018;197.

98.    Parvaiz MA, Korwar V, McArthur D , et al. Large retroperitoneal haematoma: an unexpected complication of ilioinguinal nerve block for inguinal hernia repair. Anaesthesia 2012;67:80–1. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06971.x

99.    Idestrup C, Sawhney M, Nix C , et al. The incidence of hematoma formation in patients with continuous femoral catheters following total knee arthroplasty while receiving rivaroxaban as thromboprophylaxis: an observational study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2014;39:414–7. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000127 

100.  Tsui BCH, Kirkham K, Kwofie MK , et al. Practice advisory on the bleeding risks for peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blockade: evidence review and expert consensus. Can J Anaesth 2019;66:1356–84. doi:10.1007/s12630-019-01466-w 

101.  Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Murad MH , et al. Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest 2022;162:e207–43. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.025 

102.  BMS. Apixaban full prescribing information. 

Available: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_eliquis.pdf [Accessed 13 Mar 2024].

103.  Savaysa: full prescribing information. 

Available: http://dsi.com/prescribing-information-portlet/getPIContent?productName=Savaysa&inline=true [Accessed 18 Aug 2022].

104.  Rivaroxaban: full prescribing information.

 Available: https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/XARELTO-pi.pdf [Accessed 18 Aug 2022].

105.  Pradaxa: full prescribing infomation. 

Available: http://docs.boehringer-ingelheim.com/Prescribing%20Information/PIs/Pradaxa/Pradaxa.pdf [Accessed 18 Aug 2022].