Cervical cancer

A comprehensive search for guidelines was undertaken to identify the most relevant guidelines to consider for adaptation.   inclusion/exclusion criteria followed in the search and retrieval of guidelines to be adapted: 

-  Selecting only evidence-based guidelines (guidelines must include a report on systematic literature searches and explicit links between individual recommendations and their supporting evidence). - Selecting only national and/or international guidelines. 

-  Specific range of dates for publication (using Guidelines published or updated 2015 and later). 

-  Selecting peer reviewed publications only.

-  Selecting guidelines written in English language.

-  Excluding guidelines written by a single author not on behalf of an organization to be valid and comprehensive, a guideline ideally requires multidisciplinary input. 

-  Excluding guidelines published without references as the panel needs to know whether a thorough literature review was conducted and whether current evidence was used in the preparation of the recommendations. 

 All retrieved Guidelines were screened and appraised using AGREE II instrument (www.agreetrust.org) by at least two members. the panel decided a cutoff point or rank the guidelines (any guideline scoring above 50% on the rigor dimension was retained) 

The NCCN, ESMO, NICE guidelines are the main sources used while formulating the national guidelines for cervical cancer.

➡️  Evidence assessment 

 According to WHO handbook for Guidelines we used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the quality of a body of evidence, develop and report recommendations. GRADE methods are used by WHO because these represent internationally agreed standards for making transparent recommendations. Detailed information on GRADE is available through the on the following sites: 

. GRADE working group: https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/

 . GRADE online training modules:http://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/

Table 1: Quality of evidence in GRADE  

Table 2: Significance of the four levels of evidence

Table 3: Factors that determine How to upgrade or downgrade the quality of evidence  

➡️  The strength of the recommendation 

The strength of a recommendation communicates the importance of adherence to the recommendation: 

➡️Strong recommendations: With strong recommendations, the guideline communicates the message that the desirable effects of adherence to the recommendation outweigh the undesirable effects. This means that in most situations the recommendation can be adopted as policy. 

➡️Conditional recommendations: These are made when there is greater uncertainty about the four factors above (Table 2) or if local adaptation must account for a greater variety in values and preferences, or when resource use makes the intervention suitable for some, but not for other locations. This means that there is a need for substantial debate and involvement of stakeholders before this recommendation can be adopted as policy. 

When not to make recommendations; when there is lack of evidence on the effectiveness of an intervention, it may be appropriate not to make a recommendation.