Prevention and Management of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS)

According to the WHO Handbook for Guidelines, we used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the quality of a body of evidence and develop and report recommendations. GRADE methods are used by WHO because these represent internationally agreed standards for making transparent recommendations. Detailed GRADE information is available on the following sites:

■ GRADE working group:https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/

■ GRADE online training modules: http://cebgrade.mcmaster.ca/

■ GRADE profile software: http://ims.cochrane.org/revman/gradepro

For further details, Tables are included in the Annexes 

o   Table 1 Quality of Evidence in GRADE

o   Table 2 Significance of the four levels of evidence

o   Table 3 Factors that determine How to upgrade or downgrade the quality of evidence

The strength of the recommendation

The strength of a recommendation communicates the importance of adherence to the recommendation.

-  Strong recommendations

With strong recommendations, the guideline communicates the message that the desirable effects of adherence to the recommendation outweigh the undesirable effects. This means that in most situations the recommendation can be adopted as policy.

- Conditional recommendations

These are made when there is greater uncertainty about the four factors above, if local adaptation has to account for a greater variety in values and preferences, or when resource use makes the intervention suitable for some, but not for other locations. This means that there is a need for substantial debate and involvement of stakeholders before this recommendation can be adopted as policy.

- When not to make recommendations

When there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of an intervention, it may be appropriate not to make a recommendation.

- Good practice statement (GPPs)

GPPs are not an alternative to evidence-based recommendations; any evidence relating to a key question excludes the possibility of using a GPP to make a recommendation. GPPs might be used to emphasize the importance of patient participation in decision-making about specific procedures or advise caution where there is a perceived risk of harm but no available direct evidence of such harm