البحث الشامل غير مفعل
تخطى إلى المحتوى الرئيسي
كتاب

Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic therapy

متطلبات الإكمال
"last update: 22 April  2026"                                                                                 Download Guideline

- Annexes

Annex I: Evidence-to-Decision Tables

1.     Transition to "Low/High Dose" Terminology and Conservative Timing

Recommendation: Replace "prophylactic/therapeutic" dosing with "low/high dose" and maintain a conservative "antihemorrhagic" approach for wait times.

Criterion

 

Evidence

Judgment

Remarks

Benefits

Standardizes dosing descriptions across international guidelines (ESAIC/ESRA).

Large

Reduces confusion regarding "therapeutic" doses used for prophylaxis in high-risk patients.

Risks

Hemorrhagic complications are rare but catastrophic (e.g., spinal hematoma).

Moderate–Large

Conservative timing (e.g., 72h for high-dose DOACs) prioritizes patient safety.

Values & Preferences

Patients and clinicians prioritize the avoidance of permanent neurologic injury.

High

An "antihemorrhagic" focus is preferred over shorter "antithrombotic" windows.

Acceptability

Alignment with FDA labeling and pharmacological half-lives.

High

More acceptable for risk-averse perioperative environments.

Feasibility

Requires clinician education on the new "Low/High" dose definitions.

Moderate

Ease of use is improved by consistent terminology across specialties.

2.     Classification of Deep Plexus and Peripheral Blocks as "High Risk."

Recommendation: Apply the same stringent timing guidelines for neuraxial blocks to deep, non-compressible, or concealed peripheral blocks.

 

Criterion

 

Evidence

Judgment

Remarks

Benefits

Prevents significant morbidity from non-compressible bleeding (e.g., psoas or retroperitoneal hematoma).

Moderate

Essential for blocks like the lumbar plexus, paravertebral, and stellate ganglion.

Risks

Bleeding in these sites can lead to massive blood loss and neural deficit.

Large

Bleeding is often "concealed," delaying diagnosis compared to superficial sites.

Certainty of Evidence

Based on case reports and expert consensus (Level III).

Low–Moderate

Rarity of events prevents RCTs; expert opinion drives the safety mandate.

Resources

Requires access to emergency imaging (MRI/CT) if hematoma is suspected.

Moderate

Systems must have pathways for rapid diagnosis of deep bleeding.

Feasibility

Easily integrated into existing neuraxial safety checklists.

High

Simplifies decision-making by using a "one-rule" approach for high-risk sites.


3.     Evidence-to-Decision Summary for Dosing and Timing

Criterion

 

Evidence & Judgment (ASRA 2025)

Remarks

Dosing Definition

Use "Low Dose" and "High Dose" based on actual milligrams administered.

Replaces the subjective "prophylactic/therapeutic" labels.

High-Risk Blocks

Include all neuraxial AND deep peripheral/plexus blocks.

Non-compressible sites carry similar risks to the epidural space.

Wait Times

Based on 5 half-lives for High Dose; 2-3 half-lives for Low Dose.

 

Ensures ≤ 5 - 10% residual drug activity before block.

4.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of DOACs

Criterion

 

DOACs

Problem

   DOACs complicate neuraxial anesthesia.

Benefit

   Safe block if withheld 48–72 h.

Risk/Harm

   High hematoma risk if too early.

Certainty of Evidence

   Moderate.

Values & Preference

   Clinicians prefer conservative timing.

Resource Use

   Renal function testing required.

Equity

   Limited in low-resource regions.

Acceptability

   High if timing is respected.

5.    Evidence-to-Decision Table of UFH

Criterion

 

UFH (Subcutaneous & Intravenous)

Problem

Patients on UFH require low or high anticoagulation, complicating neuraxial anesthesia.

Benefit

Safe neuraxial block is possible if timing and dose are respected.

Risk/Harm

Risk of spinal/epidural hematoma, especially with high-dose SC or continuous IV infusion.

Certainty of Evidence

Moderate for SC low-dose.

Low for SC high-dose

 high for IV infusion.

Values& Preference

Clinicians prioritize patient safety and prefer clear timing rules.

Resource Use

Minimal cost; requires lab monitoring for IV UFH.

Equity

Widely available; monitoring may be limited in low-resource settings.

Acceptability

High for low-dose SC; moderate for high-dose SC; high for IV with monitoring.

Feasibility

Easy for SC low-dose; requires planning for SC high-dose and IV infusion.

Recommendation 

SC UFH ≤ 5,000 units BID/TID: neuraxial block safe without delay. SC UFH > 10,000 units/day: delay ≥ 12 h. IV UFH infusion: stop 4–6 h before block and confirm normal coagulation.

6.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of LMWH  

Criterion

 

LMWH (Low & High-Dosing)

Problem

LMWH is widely used for surgical prophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation, complicating neuraxial anesthesia.

Benefit

Safe neuraxial block is possible if dosing intervals are respected.

Risk/Harm

Risk of spinal/epidural hematoma if block is performed too soon after dosing.

Certainty of Evidence

High for both low and high-dosing.

Values & Preference

Clinicians strongly prefer safety margins and clear timing guidance.

Resource Use

Minimal cost; routine monitoring not required.

Equity

Widely available; dosing schedules may vary globally.

Acceptability

High acceptability when timing rules are followed.

Feasibility

Easy to implement with clear scheduling.

Recommendation

Prophylactic LMWH: delay ≥ 12 h after last dose. Therapeutic LMWH: delay ≥ 24 h after last dose. Restart LMWH ≥ 4 h after catheter removal.

7.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of Antiplatelets

Criterion

 

Aspirin / Clopidogrel / Ticagrelor / Prasugrel

Problem

   Antiplatelets complicate neuraxial anesthesia.

Benefit

   Safe block possible after discontinuation (except aspirin).

Risk/Harm

   Hematoma risk if active.

Certainty of Evidence

   High.

Values & Preference

   Safety prioritized.

Resource Use

   No monitoring available.

Equity

   Widely available.

Acceptability

   High if timing is respected.

Feasibility

   Easy with discontinuation.

Recommendation

   Aspirin: safe. Clopidogrel/ticagrelor: stop ≥ 5–7 d. Prasugrel:     

   stop ≥ 7–   10 days.

Remarks

   Restart only after catheter removal.

8.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of Thrombolytics

Criterion

 

Thrombolytics (tPA formulations)

Problem

   Used for acute MI, stroke, and PE.

Benefit

   Life-saving in acute events.

Risk/Harm

   Extremely high hematoma risk.

Certainty of Evidence

   High.

Values & Preference

   Safety prioritized; neuraxial avoided.

Resource Use

   No safe monitoring strategy.

Equity

   Limited in low-resource settings.

Acceptability

   Low for neuraxial anesthesia.

Feasibility

   Not feasible within 10 days.

Recommendation

   Neuraxial block contraindicated within 10 days.

Remarks

   Peripheral blocks may be considered with caution.

9.     Evidence-to-Decision Table of Warfarin

Criterion

 

Warfarin (VKA; Vitamin K Antagonist)

Problem

   INR elevation complicates neuraxial anesthesia.

Benefit

   Safe block if INR ≤ 1.4.

Risk/Harm

   High hematoma risk if INR is elevated.

Certainty of Evidence

   High.

Values & Preference

   INR confirmation is essential.

Resource Use

   Requires INR testing.

Equity

   Accessible in most systems.

Acceptability

   High if INR ≤ 1.4.

Feasibility

   Easy with routine INR monitoring.

Recommendation

   Perform block only if INR ≤ 1.4.

Remarks

   Resume warfarin after catheter removal.

Annex II: Timing Tables

 

1.     Timing Table of LMWH:

 

Dosing

Pre-procedure Hold

Catheter Dwell

Removal

Resumption

Low

≥12 h

Caution

≥12 h after last dose

≥4 h post-removal

High

≥24 h

Avoid

≥24 h after last dose

Individualized, delay if bleeding risk.

2.    Specific Drug Timing (Wait Times Before Block)

Drug Category

 

Low Dose (Wait Time)

High Dose (Wait Time)

UFH (Heparin)

4–6 hours

24 hours (check aPTT)

LMWH (Enoxaparin)

12 hours

24 hours

Apixaban / Rivaroxaban

24–30 hours

72 hours

Dabigatran

34–52 hours

72–110 hours (CrCl dependent)

Clopidogrel

5–7 days

5–7 days

Prasugrel

7–9 days

7–9 days

Annex III:

Traumatic (Bloody) Tap Management Protocol

 

- Definition and Identification: A Traumatic Tap is defined as the aspiration or spontaneous appearance of blood in the needle or catheter during the performance of a regional anesthetic technique. In the context of "high-risk" blocks, this indicates potential vessel injury in a non-compressible or concealed space (e.g., the epidural space or psoas compartment).

 

- Immediate Procedural Management:

  • Aspiration Check: If blood is seen, the needle should be repositioned or the procedure aborted, depending on the clinical urgency and the degree of difficulty.
  • Documentation: The occurrence of a traumatic tap must be clearly documented in the anesthetic record and the patient's medical chart to alert the postoperative care team.
  • Surgical Communication: Inform the surgical team of the event, as it may influence the choice and timing of postoperative thromboprophylaxis.
  • Medication Management (Restart Delays): To ensure the stability of the initial platelet plug and prevent the expansion of an occult hematoma, the administration of the first postoperative dose of anticoagulation must be delayed.

Medication

Post-Traumatic Tap Restart Delay

Level of Evidence

Apixaban

Delay 48 hours

Conditional / Manufacturer Recommendation

Rivaroxaban

Delay 24 hours

Conditional / Manufacturer Recommendation

LMWH (Enoxaparin)

Delay 24 hours

Strong / ASRA PM 2025

UFH (Heparin)

Delay 24 hours

Strong / ASRA PM 2025

Dabigatran / Edoxaban

Delay 24–48 hours*

Expert Opinion

 

*Note: While specific manufacturer recommendations are currently lacking for Dabigatran and Edoxaban, the ASRA 2025 "antihemorrhagic" philosophy suggests a conservative delay of at least 24 hours (or 48 hours if high-dose therapy is planned).

Appendix:

Table 1: Suggested risk stratification for patient-specific periprocedural thromboembolism*

Risk category

Mechanical heart valve

Atrial fibrillation

VTE

High (>10%/y risk of ATE or >10%/mo risk of VTE)

Mitral valve with major risk factors for stroke†
Caged ball or tilting disc mitral valve in mitral/atric position
Recent (<3 mo) stroke or TIA

CHADS₂VASc score ≥7 or CHADS₂ score of 5 or 6; recent (<3 mo) stroke or TIA; rheumatic valvular heart disease

Recent (< 3 month and especially < 1 month) VTE
Severe thrombophilia (deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin; homozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene G20210A mutation or double heterozygous for each mutation, multiple thrombophilias)
Antiphospholipid antibodies
Active cancer associated with high VTE risk‡

Moderate (4%–10%/y risk of ATE or 4%–10%/mo risk of VTE)

Mitral valve without major risk factors for stroke Bileaflet AVR with major risk factors for stroke

CHA2DS2 score of 5 or 6 or CHADS₂ score of 3 or 4

VTE within past 3–12 mo
Recurrent VTE
Non-severe thrombophilia (heterozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene G20210A mutation)
Active cancer or recent history of cancer

Low (<4%/y risk of ATE or <2%/mo risk of VTE)

Bileaflet AVR without major risk factors for stroke†

CHA₂DS₂ Vasc score of 1–4 or CHADS₂ score of 0–2 (and no prior stroke or TIA)

VTE >12 mo ago

 *Empiric risk stratification that is a starting point for assessing perioperative thromboembolism risk; should be combined with clinical judgment that incorporates individual patient-related and surgery/procedure-related factors.

†Includes: AF, prior stroke/TIA during anticoagulant interruption or other prior stroke/TIA, prior valve thrombosis, rheumatic heart disease [101].

Table 2: VTE risk scoring tools: medical patients.

Risk factor

Points

PADUA score [9]

IMPROVE score [10]

Active cancer

3

2

Prior VTE

3

3

Reduced mobility

3

Limb paresis (2 points)

Immobility ≥ 7 days (1 point)

Thrombophilia

3

2

Recent trauma/surgery (≤1 month)

2

Age ≥70 years

1

1 (age >60 years)

Heart or respiratory failure

1

Acute MI or ischemic stroke

1

ICU stay (1 point)

Acute infection/rheumatological disorder

1

Obesity (BMI >30)

1

Hormonal therapy

1

High thrombosis risk

≥4 points

≥4 points

 

BMI, body mass index; ICU, intensive care unit; IMPROVE, International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism; MI, myocardial infarction; PADUA, University of Padua, Padova Italy; VTE, venous thromboembolism [1].

Table 3: Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Apixaban (Eliquis) [102]

Edoxaban (Savaysa) [103]

Rivaroxaban  (Xarelto)

[104]

Dabigatran (Pradaxa)  

[105]

Low dose

Indications and dosing

Reduction in the risk of recurrent DVT and PE following initial therapy:

·        2.5 mg two times per day


Prophylaxis of DVT following THA or TKA:

·        2.5 mg two times per day

 N/A

Reduction in the risk of recurrence of DVT and/or PE in patients at continued risk for DVT and/or PE

·        In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: 10 mg once per day

·        In patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min: avoid use


Prophylaxis of DVT following THA or TKA:

·        In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: 10 mg once per day

·        In patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min: avoid use.


Prophylaxis of VTE in ill medical patients at risk for thromboembolic complications, not at high risk of bleeding

·        In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: 10 mg once per day

·        In patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min: avoid use


Reduction of risk of major cardiovascular events (CV death, MI, and stroke in CAD)

·        No dose adjustment needed based on CrCl

·        2.5 mg two times per day plus aspirin (75–100 mg once per day)


Reduction of risk of major thrombotic vascular events in PAD, including patients after recent lower extremity Revascularization due to symptomatic PAD

·        No dose adjustment needed based on CrCl

·        2.5 mg two times per day plus aspirin (75–100 mg once per day)

Prophylaxis of DVT and PE following THA:

·        In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 110 mg once per day first day, then 220 mg once per day

·        In patients with CrCl <50 mL/min and concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (ie, dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole): avoid coadministration

     High dose

Indications and dosing

Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF:

·        5 mg two times per day

·        In patients with at least two of the following characteristics: age ≥80 years, body weight <60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL:

·        2.5 mg two times per day


Treatment of DVT and PE:

·        10 mg two times per day for 7 days, followed by 5 mg two times per day

·        In patients receiving 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day and concomitant use of P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (ie, ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir): reduce the dose by 50%

Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF:

·        In patients with CrCl >50 to ≤95 mL/min:

·        60 mg once per day

·        Do not use in patients with CrCl >95 mL/min

·        In patients with CrCl 15–50 mL/min:

·        30 mg once per day


Treatment of DVT and PE:

·        60 mg once per day

·        In patients with one or more of the following clinical factors: CrCl 15–50 mL/min or body weight ≤60 kg, or the concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors:

·        30 mg once per day

Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF:

·        In patients with CrCl >50 mL/min:

·        20 mg once per day

·        In patients with CrCl 15–50 mL/min:

·        15 mg once per day


Treatment of DVT, PE, and reduction in the risk of recurrent DVT and of PE:

·        In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min:

·        15 mg two times per day for the first 21 days of the initial treatment

·        20 mg once per day for the remaining treatment

Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF in adult patients:

·        In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min:

·        150 mg two times per day

·        In patients with CrCl 30–50 mL/min and concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (ie, dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole):

·        75 mg two times per day

·        In patients with CrCl 15–30 ml min-1:

·        75 mg two times per day

·        In patients with CrCl <30 mL/min and concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (ie, dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole): avoid coadministration


Treatment of DVT and PE in adult patients:

·        In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 150 mg two times per day

·        Reduction in the risk of recurrent DVT and PE in adult patients:

·        In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 150 mg two times per day


CAD, coronary artery disease; CrCI, creatinine clearance; CV, cardiovascular; CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 3A4; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; MI, myocardial infarction; N/A, not available; NVAF, non-valvular atrial fibrillation; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PE, pulmonary embolism; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TIA, transient ischemic attack; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Table 4: Three Herbal Medications with the greatest impact on hemostasis*

 

Important effects

Perioperative concerns

Time to normal hemostasis after discontinuation

Garlic

Inhibition of platelet aggregation (may be irreversible)
Increased fibrinolysis
Equivocal antihypertensive activity

Potential to increase bleeding, especially when combined with other medications that inhibit platelet aggregation

7 days

Ginko

Inhibition of platelet-activating factor

Potential to increase bleeding, especially when combined with other medications that inhibit platelet aggregation

36 hours

Ginseng

Lowers blood glucose
Increased prothrombin and activated partial prothrombin times in animals
Other diverse effects

Hypoglycemia
Potential to increase risk of bleeding
Potential to decrease anticoagulant effect of warfarin

24 hours

 

Adapted from Horlocker et al. [3]

*At this time, it is not deemed necessary to discontinue herbal medications and allow resolution of their effects on hemostasis prior to surgery or anesthesia.