Annex I: Evidence-to-Decision Tables
1. Transition to "Low/High Dose" Terminology and Conservative Timing
Recommendation: Replace "prophylactic/therapeutic" dosing with "low/high dose" and maintain a conservative "antihemorrhagic" approach for wait times.
|
Criterion
|
Evidence |
Judgment |
Remarks |
|
Benefits |
Standardizes dosing descriptions across international guidelines (ESAIC/ESRA). |
Large |
Reduces confusion regarding "therapeutic" doses used for prophylaxis in high-risk patients. |
|
Risks |
Hemorrhagic complications are rare but catastrophic (e.g., spinal hematoma). |
Moderate–Large |
Conservative timing (e.g., 72h for high-dose DOACs) prioritizes patient safety. |
|
Values & Preferences |
Patients and clinicians prioritize the avoidance of permanent neurologic injury. |
High |
An "antihemorrhagic" focus is preferred over shorter "antithrombotic" windows. |
|
Acceptability |
Alignment with FDA labeling and pharmacological half-lives. |
High |
More acceptable for risk-averse perioperative environments. |
|
Feasibility |
Requires clinician education on the new "Low/High" dose definitions. |
Moderate |
Ease of use is improved by consistent terminology across specialties. |
2. Classification of Deep Plexus and Peripheral Blocks as "High Risk."
Recommendation: Apply the same stringent timing guidelines for neuraxial blocks to deep, non-compressible, or concealed peripheral blocks.
|
Criterion
|
Evidence |
Judgment |
Remarks |
|
Benefits |
Prevents significant morbidity from non-compressible bleeding (e.g., psoas or retroperitoneal hematoma). |
Moderate |
Essential for blocks like the lumbar plexus, paravertebral, and stellate ganglion. |
|
Risks |
Bleeding in these sites can lead to massive blood loss and neural deficit. |
Large |
Bleeding is often "concealed," delaying diagnosis compared to superficial sites. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
Based on case reports and expert consensus (Level III). |
Low–Moderate |
Rarity of events prevents RCTs; expert opinion drives the safety mandate. |
|
Resources |
Requires access to emergency imaging (MRI/CT) if hematoma is suspected. |
Moderate |
Systems must have pathways for rapid diagnosis of deep bleeding. |
|
Feasibility |
Easily integrated into existing neuraxial safety checklists. |
High |
Simplifies decision-making by using a "one-rule" approach for high-risk sites. |
3. Evidence-to-Decision Summary for Dosing and Timing
|
Criterion
|
Evidence & Judgment (ASRA 2025) |
Remarks |
|
Dosing Definition |
Use "Low Dose" and "High Dose" based on actual milligrams administered. |
Replaces the subjective "prophylactic/therapeutic" labels. |
|
High-Risk Blocks |
Include all neuraxial AND deep peripheral/plexus blocks. |
Non-compressible sites carry similar risks to the epidural space. |
|
Wait Times |
Based on 5 half-lives for High Dose; 2-3 half-lives for Low Dose.
|
Ensures ≤ 5 - 10% residual drug activity before block. |
4. Evidence-to-Decision Table of DOACs
|
Criterion
|
DOACs |
|
Problem |
DOACs complicate neuraxial anesthesia. |
|
Benefit |
Safe block if withheld 48–72 h. |
|
Risk/Harm |
High hematoma risk if too early. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
Moderate. |
|
Values & Preference |
Clinicians prefer conservative timing. |
|
Resource Use |
Renal function testing required. |
|
Equity |
Limited in low-resource regions. |
|
Acceptability |
High if timing is respected. |
5. Evidence-to-Decision Table of UFH
|
Criterion
|
UFH (Subcutaneous & Intravenous) |
|
Problem |
Patients on UFH require low or high anticoagulation, complicating neuraxial anesthesia. |
|
Benefit |
Safe neuraxial block is possible if timing and dose are respected. |
|
Risk/Harm |
Risk of spinal/epidural hematoma, especially with high-dose SC or continuous IV infusion. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
Moderate for SC low-dose. Low for SC high-dose high for IV infusion. |
|
Values& Preference |
Clinicians prioritize patient safety and prefer clear timing rules. |
|
Resource Use |
Minimal cost; requires lab monitoring for IV UFH. |
|
Equity |
Widely available; monitoring may be limited in low-resource settings. |
|
Acceptability |
High for low-dose SC; moderate for high-dose SC; high for IV with monitoring. |
|
Feasibility |
Easy for SC low-dose; requires planning for SC high-dose and IV infusion. |
|
Recommendation |
SC UFH ≤ 5,000 units BID/TID: neuraxial block safe without delay. SC UFH > 10,000 units/day: delay ≥ 12 h. IV UFH infusion: stop 4–6 h before block and confirm normal coagulation. |
6. Evidence-to-Decision Table of LMWH
|
Criterion
|
LMWH (Low & High-Dosing) |
|
Problem |
LMWH is widely used for surgical prophylaxis and therapeutic anticoagulation, complicating neuraxial anesthesia. |
|
Benefit |
Safe neuraxial block is possible if dosing intervals are respected. |
|
Risk/Harm |
Risk of spinal/epidural hematoma if block is performed too soon after dosing. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
High for both low and high-dosing. |
|
Values & Preference |
Clinicians strongly prefer safety margins and clear timing guidance. |
|
Resource Use |
Minimal cost; routine monitoring not required. |
|
Equity |
Widely available; dosing schedules may vary globally. |
|
Acceptability |
High acceptability when timing rules are followed. |
|
Feasibility |
Easy to implement with clear scheduling. |
|
Recommendation |
Prophylactic LMWH: delay ≥ 12 h after last dose. Therapeutic LMWH: delay ≥ 24 h after last dose. Restart LMWH ≥ 4 h after catheter removal. |
7. Evidence-to-Decision Table of Antiplatelets
|
Criterion
|
Aspirin / Clopidogrel / Ticagrelor / Prasugrel |
|
Problem |
Antiplatelets complicate neuraxial anesthesia. |
|
Benefit |
Safe block possible after discontinuation (except aspirin). |
|
Risk/Harm |
Hematoma risk if active. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
High. |
|
Values & Preference |
Safety prioritized. |
|
Resource Use |
No monitoring available. |
|
Equity |
Widely available. |
|
Acceptability |
High if timing is respected. |
|
Feasibility |
Easy with discontinuation. |
|
Recommendation |
Aspirin: safe. Clopidogrel/ticagrelor: stop ≥ 5–7 d. Prasugrel: stop ≥ 7– 10 days. |
|
Remarks |
Restart only after catheter removal. |
8. Evidence-to-Decision Table of Thrombolytics
|
Criterion
|
Thrombolytics (tPA formulations) |
|
Problem |
Used for acute MI, stroke, and PE. |
|
Benefit |
Life-saving in acute events. |
|
Risk/Harm |
Extremely high hematoma risk. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
High. |
|
Values & Preference |
Safety prioritized; neuraxial avoided. |
|
Resource Use |
No safe monitoring strategy. |
|
Equity |
Limited in low-resource settings. |
|
Acceptability |
Low for neuraxial anesthesia. |
|
Feasibility |
Not feasible within 10 days. |
|
Recommendation |
Neuraxial block contraindicated within 10 days. |
|
Remarks |
Peripheral blocks may be considered with caution. |
9. Evidence-to-Decision Table of Warfarin
|
Criterion
|
Warfarin (VKA; Vitamin K Antagonist) |
|
Problem |
INR elevation complicates neuraxial anesthesia. |
|
Benefit |
Safe block if INR ≤ 1.4. |
|
Risk/Harm |
High hematoma risk if INR is elevated. |
|
Certainty of Evidence |
High. |
|
Values & Preference |
INR confirmation is essential. |
|
Resource Use |
Requires INR testing. |
|
Equity |
Accessible in most systems. |
|
Acceptability |
High if INR ≤ 1.4. |
|
Feasibility |
Easy with routine INR monitoring. |
|
Recommendation |
Perform block only if INR ≤ 1.4. |
|
Remarks |
Resume warfarin after catheter removal. |
Annex II: Timing Tables
1. Timing Table of LMWH:
|
Dosing |
Pre-procedure Hold |
Catheter Dwell |
Removal |
Resumption |
|
Low |
≥12 h |
Caution |
≥12 h after last dose |
≥4 h post-removal |
|
High |
≥24 h |
Avoid |
≥24 h after last dose |
Individualized, delay if bleeding risk. |
2. Specific Drug Timing (Wait Times Before Block)
|
Drug Category
|
Low Dose (Wait Time) |
High Dose (Wait Time) |
|
UFH (Heparin) |
4–6 hours |
24 hours (check aPTT) |
|
LMWH (Enoxaparin) |
12 hours |
24 hours |
|
Apixaban / Rivaroxaban |
24–30 hours |
72 hours |
|
Dabigatran |
34–52 hours |
72–110 hours (CrCl dependent) |
|
Clopidogrel |
5–7 days |
5–7 days |
|
Prasugrel |
7–9 days |
7–9 days |
Annex III:
Traumatic (Bloody) Tap Management Protocol
- Definition and Identification: A Traumatic Tap is defined as the aspiration or spontaneous appearance of blood in the needle or catheter during the performance of a regional anesthetic technique. In the context of "high-risk" blocks, this indicates potential vessel injury in a non-compressible or concealed space (e.g., the epidural space or psoas compartment).
- Immediate Procedural Management:
|
Medication |
Post-Traumatic Tap Restart Delay |
Level of Evidence |
|
Apixaban |
Delay 48 hours |
Conditional / Manufacturer Recommendation |
|
Rivaroxaban |
Delay 24 hours |
Conditional / Manufacturer Recommendation |
|
LMWH (Enoxaparin) |
Delay 24 hours |
Strong / ASRA PM 2025 |
|
UFH (Heparin) |
Delay 24 hours |
Strong / ASRA PM 2025 |
|
Dabigatran / Edoxaban |
Delay 24–48 hours* |
Expert Opinion |
*Note: While specific manufacturer recommendations are currently lacking for Dabigatran and Edoxaban, the ASRA 2025 "antihemorrhagic" philosophy suggests a conservative delay of at least 24 hours (or 48 hours if high-dose therapy is planned).
Appendix:
Table 1: Suggested risk stratification for patient-specific periprocedural thromboembolism*
|
Risk category |
Mechanical heart valve |
Atrial fibrillation |
VTE |
|
High (>10%/y risk of ATE or >10%/mo risk of VTE) |
Mitral valve with major risk factors for
stroke† |
CHADS₂VASc score ≥7 or CHADS₂ score of 5 or 6; recent (<3 mo) stroke or TIA; rheumatic valvular heart disease |
Recent (< 3 month and especially < 1
month) VTE |
|
Moderate (4%–10%/y risk of ATE or 4%–10%/mo risk of VTE) |
Mitral valve without major risk factors for stroke Bileaflet AVR with major risk factors for stroke |
CHA2DS2 score of 5 or 6 or CHADS₂ score of 3 or 4 |
VTE within past 3–12 mo |
|
Low (<4%/y risk of ATE or <2%/mo risk of VTE) |
Bileaflet AVR without major risk factors for stroke† |
CHA₂DS₂ Vasc score of 1–4 or CHADS₂ score of 0–2 (and no prior stroke or TIA) |
VTE >12 mo ago |
*Empiric risk stratification that is a starting point for assessing perioperative thromboembolism risk; should be combined with clinical judgment that incorporates individual patient-related and surgery/procedure-related factors.
†Includes: AF, prior stroke/TIA during anticoagulant interruption or other prior stroke/TIA, prior valve thrombosis, rheumatic heart disease [101].
Table 2: VTE risk scoring tools: medical patients.
|
Risk factor |
Points |
|
|
PADUA score [9] |
IMPROVE score [10] |
|
|
Active cancer |
3 |
2 |
|
Prior VTE |
3 |
3 |
|
Reduced mobility |
3 |
Limb paresis (2 points) |
|
Immobility ≥ 7 days (1 point) |
||
|
Thrombophilia |
3 |
2 |
|
Recent trauma/surgery (≤1 month) |
2 |
– |
|
Age ≥70 years |
1 |
1 (age >60 years) |
|
Heart or respiratory failure |
1 |
– |
|
Acute MI or ischemic stroke |
1 |
ICU stay (1 point) |
|
Acute infection/rheumatological disorder |
1 |
– |
|
Obesity (BMI >30) |
1 |
– |
|
Hormonal therapy |
1 |
– |
|
High thrombosis risk |
≥4 points |
≥4 points |
BMI, body mass index; ICU, intensive care unit; IMPROVE, International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism; MI, myocardial infarction; PADUA, University of Padua, Padova Italy; VTE, venous thromboembolism [1].
Table 3: Direct Oral Anticoagulants
|
Apixaban (Eliquis) [102] |
Edoxaban (Savaysa) [103] |
Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) [104] |
Dabigatran (Pradaxa) [105] |
|
|
Low dose |
||||
|
Indications and dosing |
Reduction in the risk of recurrent DVT and PE following initial therapy: · 2.5 mg two times per day
· 2.5 mg two times per day |
N/A |
Reduction in the risk of recurrence of DVT and/or PE in patients at continued risk for DVT and/or PE · In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: 10 mg once per day · In patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min: avoid use
· In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: 10 mg once per day · In patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min: avoid use.
· In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: 10 mg once per day · In patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min: avoid use
· No dose adjustment needed based on CrCl · 2.5 mg two times per day plus aspirin (75–100 mg once per day)
· No dose adjustment needed based on CrCl · 2.5 mg two times per day plus aspirin (75–100 mg once per day) |
Prophylaxis of DVT and PE following THA: · In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 110 mg once per day first day, then 220 mg once per day · In patients with CrCl <50 mL/min and concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (ie, dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole): avoid coadministration |
|
High dose |
||||
|
Indications and dosing |
Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF: · 5 mg two times per day · In patients with at least two of the following characteristics: age ≥80 years, body weight <60 kg, or serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL: · 2.5 mg two times per day
· 10 mg two times per day for 7 days, followed by 5 mg two times per day · In patients receiving 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day and concomitant use of P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (ie, ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir): reduce the dose by 50% |
Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF: · In patients with CrCl >50 to ≤95 mL/min: · 60 mg once per day · Do not use in patients with CrCl >95 mL/min · In patients with CrCl 15–50 mL/min: · 30 mg once per day
· 60 mg once per day · In patients with one or more of the following clinical factors: CrCl 15–50 mL/min or body weight ≤60 kg, or the concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors: · 30 mg once per day |
Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF: · In patients with CrCl >50 mL/min: · 20 mg once per day · In patients with CrCl 15–50 mL/min: · 15 mg once per day
· In patients with a CrCl >15 mL/min: · 15 mg two times per day for the first 21 days of the initial treatment · 20 mg once per day for the remaining treatment |
Reduction of risk of stroke and systemic embolism in NVAF in adult patients: · In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: · 150 mg two times per day · In patients with CrCl 30–50 mL/min and concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (ie, dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole): · 75 mg two times per day · In patients with CrCl 15–30 ml min-1: · 75 mg two times per day · In patients with CrCl <30 mL/min and concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors (ie, dronedarone or systemic ketoconazole): avoid coadministration
· In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 150 mg two times per day · Reduction in the risk of recurrent DVT and PE in adult patients: · In patients with CrCl >30 mL/min: 150 mg two times per day |
CAD, coronary artery disease; CrCI, creatinine clearance; CV, cardiovascular;
CYP3A4, cytochrome P450 3A4; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; MI, myocardial
infarction; N/A, not available; NVAF, non-valvular atrial fibrillation; PAD,
peripheral artery disease; PE, pulmonary embolism; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; THA,
total hip arthroplasty; TIA, transient ischemic attack; VTE, venous
thromboembolism.
Table 4: Three Herbal Medications with the greatest impact on hemostasis*
|
Important effects |
Perioperative concerns |
Time to normal hemostasis after discontinuation |
|
|
Garlic |
Inhibition
of platelet aggregation (may be irreversible) |
Potential to increase bleeding, especially when combined with other medications that inhibit platelet aggregation |
7 days |
|
Ginko |
Inhibition of platelet-activating factor |
Potential to increase bleeding, especially when combined with other medications that inhibit platelet aggregation |
36 hours |
|
Ginseng |
Lowers
blood glucose |
Hypoglycemia |
24 hours |
Adapted from Horlocker et al. [3]
*At this time, it is not deemed necessary to discontinue herbal medications and allow resolution of their effects on hemostasis prior to surgery or anesthesia.