|
Strength of the recommendation |
|
|
Diagnostic work-up for localized colon cancer
|
|
|
In the absence of a bowel obstruction or massive haemorrhage, which may constitute indications of an urgent tumour resection, a total colonoscopy is recommended for diagnostic confirmation of colon cancer as there are many advantages of endoscopy including determination and marking of the exact tumour location, biopsy of the lesion, and detection and removal of (further) synchronous precancerous or cancerous lesions.
|
Strong |
|
In cases where complete colonic exploration cannot be carried out before surgery, a complete colonoscopy should be carried out within 3 to 6 months. |
Strong |
|
A complete work-up should be carried out to achieve an accurate histological diagnosis of the primary tumor, assess the baseline characteristics of the patient and determine the extent of the disease. |
Strong |
|
Besides a comprehensive physical examination, blood tests including complete blood count and chemistry profile should be performed. |
Strong |
|
In addition, serum levels of CEA (although not sufficient for colon cancer diagnosis themselves in the absence of a confirmatory tumor biopsy) should be evaluated before surgery and monitored during the follow-up period to help the early detection of metastatic disease. |
Strong |
|
CT of the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic cavities with i.v. contrast administration is the preferred radiological method for the evaluation of the extent of CRC. |
Strong |
|
Contrast-enhanced MRI constitutes the reference test for evaluation of the relationship of locally advanced tumors with surrounding structures or in defining ambiguous hepatic lesions. |
Strong |
|
FDG/PET,with or without integrated CT (PET/CT), does not add significant information to the CT scans on preoperative staging of CRC and is not recommended for routine use in staging of localized CRC except if assisting in interpretation of ambiguous findings. |
Strong |
|
MANAGEMENT OF LOCAL/LOCOREGIONAL DISEASE |
|
|
General recommendations
|
|
|
En bloc endoscopic resection of the polyp is recommended and sufficient for non-invasive (pTis, i.e. intraepithelial or intramucosal) adenocarcinomas. |
Strong |
|
The presence of invasive carcinoma (pT1) in a polyp should require a thorough review with the pathologist and surgeon. High-risk features mandating surgical resection with lymphadenectomy include lymphatic or venous invasion, grade 2 or 3 differentiation, or tumour budding. |
Strong |
|
Laparoscopic colectomy can be safely carried out for colon cancer when technical expertise is available in the absence of contraindications, in view of reduced morbidity, improved tolerance and similar oncological outcomes. |
Conditional |
|
Obstructive CRCs can be treated in one- or two-stage procedures, as indicated. |
Strong |
|
A standard surgical/pathological report should include specimen description and surgical procedure, tumour site and size, macroscopic tumour perforation, histological type and grade, extension into the bowel wall and adjacent organs, distance of cancer from resected margins (proximal, distal and radial), presence or absence of tumour deposits, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, tumour budding, site and number of removed and involved regional lymph nodes, and involvement of other organs. |
Strong |
|
Adjuvant therapy options should be fully discussed with the patient, taking into consideration tumour risk of recurrence, expected benefit from chemotherapy and risk of complications. |
Good Practice Statement
|
|
The risk of relapse after a colon cancer resection should be assessed by integrating the TNM staging, biologic profile and number of lymph nodes sampled. |
Strong |
|
Other additional clinicopathological features such as the histological subtype and grading, lymphatic or venous or perineural invasion, lymphoid inflammatory response ,involvement of resection margins and bowel obstruction should be taken into consideration for refining the risk assessment on stage II tumours. |
Strong |
|
Conditional |
|
|
Management of stage II and III disease |
|
|
Stage III disease |
|
|
Combinations of fluoropyrimidines, either 5-FU or capecitabine, and oxaliplatin constitute the basis for stage III colon cancer adjuvant treatment. |
Strong |
|
Strong |
|
|
The length of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer based on the IDEA data should be tailored to 3 or 6 months for CAPOX or 6 months for FOLFOX, and also taking into consideration pathological risk characteristics, patient comorbidity and risk assessment (see Annex 4). |
Strong |
|
For patients not fit for or not tolerating oxaliplatin, either capecitabine or LV5FU2 (de Gramont) infusion are acceptable alternative adjuvant regimens for a 6-month duration. |
Strong |
|
Stage II disease |
|
|
Strong |
|
|
For patients with intermediate risk (non-MMR/MSI + any risk factor except pT4 or multiple intermediate risk factors, regardless of MSI) consider the addition of oxaliplatin (see Annex 3). |
Conditional |
|
Patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (see Annex 3) are to be considered for 3 months of CAPOX, as the IDEA-pooled analysis showed non-inferiority of 3 months of CAPOX and inferiority of 3 months of FOLFOX when compared with 6 months of FOLFOX, with all the limitations of post-hoc analyses (see Annex 4). |
Strong |
|
Follow up |
|
|
Intensive follow-up allows earlier detection of relapses in patients at risk |
Strong |
|
History and physical examination and CEA level determination are advised every 3-6 months for 2 years and every 6 months for the following 3 years. |
Strong |
|
Colonoscopy must be carried out at year 1 and if advanced adenoma, repeat in 1 year, but if no advanced adenoma, repeat after 3 years, then every 5 years |
Strong |
|
Perform CT scan of chest and abdomen every 6-12 months from date of surgery for a total of 5 years. |
Strong |
|
Other laboratory and radiological examinations are of unproven benefit and must be restricted to patients with suspicious symptoms. |
Conditional |
|
Long-term follow-up, rehabilitation and survivorship care programmes should be implemented, aiming at detection of recurrent or new cancers, assessment and management of late and psychosocial effects and implementation of health promotion measures. |
Strong |